Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-29-2021, 05:37 PM   #21
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 386 Times in 224 Posts

Default

Bill many people would look at the cold blued Titanic and accept it as factory back in the day. I suppose Bernard steel would have been more believable. The nitro proofs raise a red flag and how about that serial which exceeds Parker production by more than 30,000. Peter Johnson may not have been the most knowledgeable Parker collector but he cultivated a great deal of interest in Parkers and American doubles in general for having taken the time to write the book.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 09:44 AM   #22
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,971
Thanks: 1,269
Thanked 5,286 Times in 1,499 Posts

Default

Richard, the GHE is more likely 3 iron crolle. If you can see the dividing line that splits a crolle, follow it to the next dividing line. Count the full crolles and 2 split crolles and you have your total. The dividing lines are sometimes hard to see but the lower DH is easily seen.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:57 AM   #23
Member
Keith Doty
PGCA Member
 
Keith Doty's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 610
Thanks: 674
Thanked 802 Times in 323 Posts

Default

The altered serial number intrigues me. WHY? Isn't that a big issue with ATF?
Keith Doty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 02:24 PM   #24
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,463
Thanks: 6,711
Thanked 9,809 Times in 5,204 Posts

Default

Pre 1899 serial number, ATF does not consider this a gun. You can stamp what you want on it.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 04:44 PM   #25
Member
Brian H
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Hornacek's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 874
Thanks: 2,112
Thanked 4,726 Times in 518 Posts

Default

Is this the gun that someone stamped nitro proof on the barrel flat?
Brian Hornacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 05:34 PM   #26
Member
Jim DiSpagno
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2,750 Times in 808 Posts

Default

Yes Brian.
Jim DiSpagno is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 06:07 PM   #27
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 386 Times in 224 Posts

Default

The gun is unique though as it is the only double gun I can remember that only has 1 barrel nitro proofed.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:08 PM   #28
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,100
Thanks: 4,541
Thanked 3,011 Times in 969 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
One would not need to read Johnson's book to recognize that rendering of "Titanic" as an alteration of the factory marking. There was a great wealth of Parker knowledge in the years before Johnson's book was published.
So how does someone restamp TITANIC over DAMASCUS that has been removed, yet one can still see the Damascus pattern in the rib below the roll stamp with no evidence of filing/grinding and welding up? Isn't it just possible that it was a rare mistake?
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:36 PM   #29
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 3,826
Thanked 6,492 Times in 1,553 Posts

Default

Jerry you have a point there. Although with all of the other unusual markings I tend to agree something not so straight up took place on this gun.
SN is 27404 which was made in 1882. When did Titanic steel barrels come out?
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-31-2021, 05:40 AM   #30
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,840
Thanks: 38,431
Thanked 35,761 Times in 13,103 Posts

Default

74842

Titanic barrels were first introduced in 1897 I believe.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.