Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-07-2020, 03:45 PM   #21
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,263
Thanks: 368
Thanked 4,251 Times in 1,379 Posts

Default

This is my barrel evaluation template. Nothing proprietary about it so feel free to use. The Word doc is more clear.



There is ample space at the bottom for comments ie. DO NOT USE THIS BARREL
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 03-07-2020, 05:48 PM   #22
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,485
Thanks: 6,729
Thanked 9,840 Times in 5,221 Posts

Default

Drew, thank you for repeating my instructions for the "best" method for use of the Manson gauge. It seems a bit wordy, but that was the best I could do. A you-tube video would simplify my instructions if I could ever get around to doing that.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-07-2020, 06:00 PM   #23
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,485
Thanks: 6,729
Thanked 9,840 Times in 5,221 Posts

Default

With an assistant, I completed a search of bore measurements and wall thickness measurements of a pair of William Evans sidelock guns at an Alderfer's auction several years ago, using a Galazan bore micrometer and a Manson wall thickness gauge, in about twenty minutes. That included the transcribing of the measurements onto a legal pad. This allowed me to purchase a cased pair of second tier London sidelock guns in high condition for a price that anyone without these measurements wouldn't have had the nerve to purchase at any reasonable price. The guns were perfect, original, no work done on the guns including extending chambers, all bores completely untouched. My tools cost me about $225.00 and I have used them for decades.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-07-2020, 06:07 PM   #24
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
A you-tube video would simplify my instructions if I could ever get around to doing that.
I couldn't help myself, but we've been waiting so long for you to post a picture, a video just seems too good to be true. But, If it did happen, I have no doubt it would get an Emmy I just love a good movie, and popcorn.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 03-07-2020, 06:40 PM   #25
Member
classicioi
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 309
Thanks: 1,276
Thanked 249 Times in 103 Posts

Default

Edgar,

Thanks for getting everyone trained up on taking measurements .... now hopefully we'll get to see some more readings ...
Karl Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-07-2020, 06:57 PM   #26
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 1,596
Thanked 1,604 Times in 668 Posts

Default

Mr Spencer and Mr. Hause, thank you both for your explanations. You have cleared up a subject which for me was very muddy.
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-07-2020, 07:06 PM   #27
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,056
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,716 Times in 4,969 Posts

Default

A manson gauge is very capable of getting accurate thickness measurements.
There is lacks is the limitation of bore size it can measure. As I recall, when I had mine it would not go into a tightly choked 20g. muzzle.
And the size of the ball on the end of the rod does
Not allow measuring into pitted areas as much as a hosford gauge does.
But, for the money, a Manson is a good piece of equipment.

The areas that Drew measures on his record sheet are the areas I like to sample As well. At the forcing cones, around the forend lug (about 9-10” out) and The minimums found out in the second half of the tubes.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 03-07-2020, 07:14 PM   #28
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,056
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,716 Times in 4,969 Posts

Default

Another thought of mine...
The whole wall thickness subject can be a little mirky to
Some as to what is “safe to shoot” and what isn’t.

There are really two ways to look at it. Ultimately one can base their safety conclusions on thresholds of overseas proof house standards. But, anything beyond that is simply based on individual experiences and knowing “well, I have shot other guns with comparable measurements to ‘the subject’ gun, so it should be just fine.
In that type of scenario, different people may have different opinions on what is “thin”.
I have heard people say that they dont like anything with a minimum under .030”. Well, if that is the case, a TON of guns left factories then and now that were/are too “thin”.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 03-07-2020, 08:03 PM   #29
Member
Garhart Stephenson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 118 Times in 14 Posts

Default

Great discussion and explanations. Having just performed these measuring procedures, I am glad that it has been pointed out how to properly zero a gauge (which takes rod flex out of the equation of zeroing), the importance of horizontal zeroing/ gauge use to eliminate gravity's affect on "rod flex" that alters readings, and the importance of not allowing the rods to contact the barrel (or anything else) which would induce rod flex errors. Excellent descriptions!
Garhart Stephenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-07-2020, 08:10 PM   #30
Member
MD*GSP
PGCA Member
 
Scot Cardillo's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 631
Thanks: 1,101
Thanked 666 Times in 241 Posts

Default

If someone wanted to make a really, really nice gage for measuring wall thickness, there are woven phenolic materials (rods) available that are super rigid and would possibly suffer little to no flex when used. Further, a notch could be cut on the end of the rod that would allow various screw-in indicator tips to be used instead of a ball on the end which would allow for very accurate measurements of pits or other irregularities in the bores.

A gage made like that would be a bit spendy, however as they say, the right tool for the job is priceless. Here's a picture of various tips that could be used on the end of the rod. I think tips like these are what Brian's referring to..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg indicator tips.jpg (249.6 KB, 2 views)
Scot Cardillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.