Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-02-2010, 07:20 PM   #21
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Black powder had a steep pressure curve than modern smokeless, so yes, the pressure rise was more abrupt than drawn-out.

Could it be that Ithaca offered a solution while stating that the fellow's old gun was unsafe? And that solution was buying a new Ithaca?
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2010, 07:22 PM   #22
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,915
Thanks: 4,389
Thanked 4,112 Times in 1,744 Posts

Default

The first thing to remember is that black powder is an explosive and smokeless is a propellant. Black powder invites a much more robust pressure curve as Mike state's.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2010, 07:33 PM   #23
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,219
Thanks: 2,179
Thanked 3,469 Times in 1,188 Posts

Default

My theory has always been that the gun manufacturers wanted to discontinue the use of Damascus for bbl steel, because of the tremendous amount of labor required to manufacture a quality set of bbls.
(I've made some of my better deals on guns, because of having Damascus, or twist steel bbls, btw)
Using fluid steel probably cuts the labor costs of building a gun in half. From a strictly marketing standpoint, it would have made total sense to the gun makers to promote the "Damascus is dangerous" bogeyman, because it would automatically make a whole generation of existing guns obsolete.
I wouldn't put it past gun makers of the day, to capitalize on the Damascus scare to sell more guns. I'm glad they did, as there are a lot more guns out there for our consumption.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to todd allen For Your Post:
Unread 11-03-2010, 08:52 AM   #24
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,888 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Day View Post
Could it be that Ithaca offered a solution while stating that the fellow's old gun was unsafe? And that solution was buying a new Ithaca?
I'll bet a dollar that the envelpoe containing that letter also contained Ithaca Gun sales brochures or catalogs
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2010, 10:03 AM   #25
Member
Jerry Andrews
Forum Associate
 
Jerry Andrews's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 127 Times in 63 Posts

Default

When I jumped in to the double gun market in 1975, the scare was the lines between the welds would have microscopic " rusting " areas that would lead to catastrophic failure if shot. I guess that's a possible scenario, but so is a bird flying down the barrel at the exact moment of pulling the trigger. I must admit that when I heard the banter on this board and the L.C. Smith board I thought everyone on here had lost their minds. Once reading the different articles however on gun testing, it's made me think completely the opposite way. These new shells available with contained pressures sure have breathed some new life into some of the most beautiful guns ever made. This 10 gauge hammer gun I just acquired with all the case colors and barrell pattern have made me appreciate a gun type I've never really noticed. No doubt, these damascus/twist barrelled guns were the most gorgeous guns America ever produced. The EH 10 gauge hammerless is also a simply beautiful gun, but it can't hold a candle to the hammer gun. The hammer gun has the crooked top lever, and a lock up as tight as a drum. What quality! I'd like to thank those on this board kind enough to put up with my neophyte questioning about these old firesticks. Thanks much, Jerry
Jerry Andrews is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Jerry Andrews's homepage!
Unread 11-03-2010, 10:25 AM   #26
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,954
Thanks: 38,666
Thanked 35,888 Times in 13,162 Posts

Default

Jerry, it's been a real pleasure reading your posts and being witness to your eager education. I find your willingness to jump right in and join discussions as an eager student refreshing. I hope you enjoy shooting those two beauties.

Dean
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2010, 10:50 AM   #27
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 758 Times in 419 Posts

Default

Mike, I could be wrong, but I don't believe the heavier recoil from a stiffer BP load will hurt the gun. It's the high pressure, not recoil that loosens the action and cracks stocks. Even a 3 3/4dram BP load is under or around 7000psi- which is not high. I've shoot many 3 1/2 dram 1oz loads - my buddy always claims " now that sounds and looks like a real gun going off ". And I say, " yea, and it feels like it ". Of course I'm useing a Parker Hammer Gun that weighs aroung 8lbs. Paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 11-03-2010, 02:08 PM   #28
Member
Jerry Andrews
Forum Associate
 
Jerry Andrews's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 127 Times in 63 Posts

Default

Dean, I doubt if I ever fire the guns, they are not my cup of tea for shooting, and I'd be sick at my stomach if the stock cracked on the hammer gun. Being a stockmaker of these old babies, I'm fully aware, more so than most, of how fragile these old stocks really are. Then again, some are shot for years and never crack. I have a Fox I've shot heavy loads for crows through forever and it's still as new. I know they are meant to shoot but when they are this clean I would not want to crack the stock on this one. But then again, they were made for shooting weren't they! Jerry
Thanks for the kind words and ecouragement about using the forum, much appreciated.
Jerry Andrews is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Jerry Andrews's homepage!
Unread 11-03-2010, 02:29 PM   #29
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Jerry, you've come a long way for a worm fisherman.

Shoot 'em and have fun , just like you do those old fashioned wood stick rods.

Here's one those things from Parker, but its probably not usuable with modern trout.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ParkerHawes%20002.jpg (55.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg ParkerHawes%20016.jpg (53.2 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg ParkerHawes%20020.jpg (46.5 KB, 1 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-03-2010, 04:03 PM   #30
Member
Jerry Andrews
Forum Associate
 
Jerry Andrews's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 127 Times in 63 Posts

Default

Wouldn't happen to be a Hawes rod would it ? I would love to find one! Jerry
It's odd being a rod maker and stock maker, you'd think I"d fish only my rods and shoot stuff I restocked but I LOVE old bamboo rods! I do shoot an Iver Johnson .410 Skeeter, Miller trigger and ejectors I stocked but otherwise, I love the old stuff. I fish a Leonard 8fter when appropriate. Jerry
The Parker 10 gauges I've decided to sell or trade. As much as I appreciate what they are they aren't my bit. But they sure are gorgeous. Jerry
Jerry Andrews is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Jerry Andrews's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.