Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-29-2018, 07:48 PM   #21
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,542
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,891 Times in 5,253 Posts

Default

The guy with the best reputation for messing with shotgun barrels has a bunch of anecdotes about screwing up barrels in our forum files and other forum files. Even those who pretend to know what they are doing put out more than their share of disasters. Sorry, not for me.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-29-2018, 07:55 PM   #22
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,957
Thanks: 38,669
Thanked 35,901 Times in 13,165 Posts

Default

Umm... does he use a torch to obtain funny-looking 'case colors' too?






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2018, 08:12 PM   #23
Member
classicioi
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 309
Thanks: 1,277
Thanked 249 Times in 103 Posts

Default

Dean, I also raped my Parker Repro 28 Ga 28" barrels many years ago. The unrealistic factory tight chokes were usless for any kind of hunting that I do and the patterns were horrible. I sent the barrels to Kirk Merrington and now at .010 & .020 the gun throws excellent patterns.

When I sell this gun some day I'm willing to bet the new owner will appreciate the new chokes just as much as I do.
Karl Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Karl Ferguson For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2018, 10:23 PM   #24
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,476
Thanks: 503
Thanked 3,939 Times in 1,672 Posts

Default

I recently handled a CSMC M21 with gold inlays of the owner's fat Jack Russell terriers. Don't know if the terriers were, in fact, that fat, or whether it was a poor inlay job, but what sealed the "Heck No" deal for me was the screw in chokes
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2018, 02:40 AM   #25
Member
stumpstalker
PGCA Member
 
Russell E. Cleary's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 997
Thanks: 11,435
Thanked 2,487 Times in 717 Posts

Default

Yes, this an old topic, widely-covered in many retrievable threads. But, it is worth bringing back for discussion as it has enduring relevance as to why we bother to seek out vintage guns to collect and shoot, when there are many traditionally-styled guns being produced today with modern stock dimensions and multiple choke choices, all of which can offer an edge in hitting wild or clay birds.

To answer the original question: For me, opening chokes reduces monetary value, while it surely can enhance other values, utility being one.

I happen to be one consumer who was willing to pay a higher price for a factory open-choked 16-gauge, 0-framed VH. It is not a high-grade or high-condition piece; in fact, it had been restored. But, for me there is a significant distinction between restored and altered (surely another debate subject).

I could have saved a lot of money if I had just sent out my father’s full-choked 16-gauge, 1-framed VH for opening. It just meant a lot to me to keep that one original and buy another -- a gun that left Meriden in 1907 essentially as it was represented to me as being: "a New England bird gun”, cylinder and modified.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Parker.16gauge,VH.141171..26.inch.jpg (496.7 KB, 18 views)
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19
Russell E. Cleary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Russell E. Cleary For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2018, 07:54 AM   #26
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,191
Thanks: 144
Thanked 792 Times in 432 Posts

Default

A other factor in value is the chance of poor choke opening work. Look at enough SXS muzzles you will see many out of round alterations. Running a reamer it’s critical everything is concentric . Problem with concentric on a hand regulated SXS barrel is they were bent to regulate. Reamer set up on the bend is not going to run true.

A very few gunsmith will set the job up carefully and refuse to alter if it is risky. Most are low price fast turn with a high percentage chance of out of round .

Want to see a high risk alteration google “Larry Potterfield open chokes” good utube on how not to do it. Did not indicate the tool before he cut, relied on the bushings to index the reamer.

William
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to William Davis For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2018, 01:38 PM   #27
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Long barrels usually mean tight chokes but not always. I once owned a CE grade 26" fox 20 bore with both barrels full choke. If I am not mistaken, Bill Murphy owned beautiful GH small bore with 26" full choke in both damascus barrels.

I sold the Fox because I bought if for grouse hunting and found the full chokes when I measured the constriction. I didn't have the chokes opened because I don't believe in opening chokes on vintage guns. To each his own, but my personal preference is to leave them alone.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2018, 01:51 PM   #28
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

I don't consider changing chokes in a repro to be raping. It is not an original Parker so I would do what I wanted with the chokes. But my thoughts are that the chokes on vintage guns should be left alone. You can't put the metal back and the gun is changed forever. I used to get good IC performance (I pattern my guns) from the old Remington post wads loaded to a bit higher pressure. The higher pressure seemed to help. I'm not talking very high pressure but in the 10,000 range.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2018, 04:15 PM   #29
Member
Kevin McCormack
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 4,324 Times in 1,206 Posts

Default

Hey Tom, where ya been? Haven't seen you in about a hundred years! Are you still in MD? If not, where?
Kevin McCormack is offline   Reply With Quote
Changing chokes
Unread 03-30-2018, 04:34 PM   #30
Member
Jeff Higgins
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 79
Thanks: 687
Thanked 105 Times in 44 Posts

Default Changing chokes

On a high condition unmolested gun I would not open the chokes. But if the gun is not original in some other way why not. There are a awful lot of straight gripped guns floating around that did not leave the factory that way. What difference would it make to open the chokes on that gun. Is it ok to bend a stock to more modern dimensions? Or is that raping it?
Jeff Higgins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.