Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-26-2015, 03:16 PM   #21
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,262
Thanks: 368
Thanked 4,249 Times in 1,378 Posts

Default

I'm sorry Edgar. I did not ask my question clearly.

I am not aware of any industrial standards for interpretation, nor have I found images, of radiography of pattern welded shotgun barrels.

Mine were done by a Level III NDE ASME accredited examiner at TEAM Industrial Services here in Phoenix, but I would also very much like to find/encourage someone with a special interest in pattern welded barrels to develop a testing program, which might have a significant commercial application.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 04-26-2015, 05:50 PM   #22
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

Ah, Yes. ASTM has a hugely expensive set of "Reference Radiographs" whose use is controlled by section E486. I have a set for "Steel Castings, Up to 2 inch" and a set for "Steel Castings, Greater than 2 inch". I believe there are similar standards for forgings and non ferrous materials, but I have never seen any where a specific product was used to develop them (no pun intended). I think pattern welded barrels predates ASTM and radiography in general, and their manufacture pretty much ceased before the technique was developed.
Most Level III examiners also maintain their Level II proficiency (sounds odd, but true) as it's the Level II who does, and interprets the procedure, under a quality manual or program written by the Level III. I was a II and III for RT, UT and MT, and oversaw the QA & QC at my company before I moved up to Mgmt (end of the fun part of my career)

In order to develop a set of standards, it would be necessary to accumulate samples with representative defects, like inclusions, gas, slag, linear and non-linear cracks, etc. These would also have to include levels of severity; kind of a go-no go set. Unless they have come up with a way to reproduce radiographs, each set of standards would have to be made from actual shots of the standards. The governing body maintains the samples (sort of like NIST I guess)
I suspect this is really boring for the bulk of readers.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 04-26-2015, 06:02 PM   #23
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,932
Thanks: 18,026
Thanked 7,672 Times in 2,927 Posts

Default

__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.