|
11-29-2012, 10:12 AM | #23 | ||||||
|
i have 2 rem 94's both grade A damascus, one ejector one extractor, both are excellent field guns, one i have is first yr production, the other is 1901 vintage according to charles semners book, they are very under rated guns, i hunt with english and american made guns, i consider the remingtons equals to the english guns,
|
||||||
11-29-2012, 03:52 PM | #24 | ||||||
|
i too have a remington 1894 its a b grade with factory ordance steel barrels that are 26 inch factory length with ejectors..its just a good shooter but i too would put a remington 94 with the best of shotguns.... charlie
|
||||||
11-29-2012, 06:17 PM | #25 | ||||||
|
It's not a crow killer but it's a nice M1900 16ga. w/ejectors, 28" nice original finish. She's choked M/F so I don't know what she can kill but it will be fun trying. Really nice quality for a modest price.
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
11-29-2012, 07:45 PM | #26 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Here is an interesting article on the Remington Doubles. http://www.bigfivehq.com/wolves3.htm |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
11-30-2012, 08:51 AM | #27 | ||||||
|
I have an 1889 Rem damascus hammer gun with tight chokes that is great long range killer. Very nicely made also. I like it a lot. It was quite the cleanup job when I got it. There's a series of pics in an old post of mine. I've had no mechanical issues with it at all except that one hammer screw keeps backing out. I have to make a custom punch that will allow me to peen the square shaft back out to get the hammer to fit tighter to remedy that.
|
||||||
11-30-2012, 12:00 PM | #28 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
11-30-2012, 03:46 PM | #29 | ||||||
|
Mr. Books
My Remington trap gun may be a 1894, I've always had a hard time telling the difference between them. My camera is down right now, but I'll list the info on the water table and barrels, maybe you or someone could help me figure this out.Serial #331632 on all parts, Water table is also marked 177, 8, a double stamped patent date of Oct 30 1894. The lug is stamped at the front with 10 over 83 over P7. The rear of the lug is stamped with a 7 and 323, 321 which I assume is shot size and pellet count. Each barrel is marked with three diagonal lines over K, over A. Any help with this would be appreciated, thanks in advance. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Brady For Your Post: |
11-30-2012, 06:26 PM | #30 | ||||||
|
A serial number in the 300,000 range would make it a model 1900, model 1894's had serial numbers in the 100,000 range. The biggest difference between the two models is the '94 has a Purdey style forend latch and the 1900 uses a Baker style snap on latch similiar to the Trojan. Dave Noreen knows quite a bit about Remington doubles hopefully he will come along soon and give some more insight.
Some information Dave posted awhile ago on the Remington forums: http://www.remingtonsociety.com/foru...php?f=7&t=2491 |
||||||
|
|