![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||||||
|
![]()
That's what the data said. Remember though that we are loading on the low end of SAAMI specs too. Not as hot as the Federal 209/209A but burn hotter than the other 209 makers.
I don't use Federal or Cheddite so I can't share any results. I know guys who use Cheddites instead of Rem, Win, etc with no issues. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Agreed completely, but note that I didn't say pressures should be ignored, just that the effects on patterns, of switching primers, shouldn't be ignored. Said another way, while low pressures are beneficial to the life of a vintage gun, they don't guarantee fine patterns. Only pattern testing determines that. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||||||
|
![]()
Pattern testing will only give an indicator of point of impact. A 2D pattern does not give a true representation of a shot string in flight. It is fine for testing if you are shooting at a static target, such as a turkey head.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | ||||||
|
![]()
Stan and Mike you both make great points, except for how to make patterning fun. I'm not even sure I know how to pattern properly, I'll ask that in another (sure to be flamed) thread later : )
__________________
Nothing ruins your Friday like finding out it's only Tuesday |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||||||
|
![]()
Andy, you have your wife stand 70 yards away and shoot three shells at her. Ask her to count how many pellets she feels, multiply that number by seven and call your lawyer. 🤣🤣
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Nothing ruins your Friday like finding out it's only Tuesday |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Stan |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
You slightly open the crimp on at least 3 shells and count the pellets to get an average count. Then replace the pellets in each shell and tighten the crimps using your fingers. Often you'll find that the actual count doesn't match the listed number for that load in terms of ounce/fractions and pellet size. Set up your paper at 40 yards (or whatever) and shoot offhand at a temporary aiming point centered on the paper. I use a red or yellow sticky note about 2-1/2" square. Then after shooting you remove the aiming point, eyeball the transparent template to center it over the bulk of the pellet strikes, and draw your outer and inner circles with a pencil. That shows the actual center POI versus the aiming point. Usually the POI doesn't exactly coincide with the aiming point and can be many inches away from shot to shot. After patterning for a while you'll find that some factory ammo is more uniform than others. Then if using a tightly choked gun you only have to count the pellets outside the 30" circle. Subtract from the average pellet count and you can cipher the efficiency (pattern percentage). For those interested in comparing hot centers for long range performance you can count the pellet strikes in the 20" circle. Lastly, if testing an open choke gun you count the pellet strikes inside the 30" circle as per typical practice and do the math. Some day you might want to do patterning with spreader shells; that can be eye opening. ![]() Now, I know some readers are thinking all this is way too detailed and they just shoot their vintage guns with existing chokes made for bare shot/fiber wads and with random modern shells. Great if that works for you on clays courses and in the field. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|