Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Announcement, Help & Introduction Forums New User Introductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-15-2024, 06:54 PM   #21
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,363
Thanks: 3,176
Thanked 12,335 Times in 3,295 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David C Porter View Post
It's easy to see the boring line around the breach chambers. The old barrels ribs removed, barrels cut off & breach bored out & sleeved barrels inserted, soldered & rechambered.
Each barrel smith has his own method, but I suspect they were furnace brazed rather than soldered. Not that it matters a whole lot because this gun looks like a nice shooter, but yoke magnaflux would instantly show a distinct line, both at the breach and the joint between new tubes and original 'block'.
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 11-15-2024, 07:57 PM   #22
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 177
Thanks: 30
Thanked 221 Times in 65 Posts

Default

I doubt that they would be furnace brazed since they were demi-bloced with the bottom bloc brazed at the breech end & the rear & top ribs soft soldered. Trying to braze the sleeves in would more than likely make the breech end come apart.
David C Porter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:29 PM   #23
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,363
Thanks: 3,176
Thanked 12,335 Times in 3,295 Posts

Default

Ribs aren't laid at that point, and they wrap the whole breech with iron wire.
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:47 PM   #24
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 177
Thanks: 30
Thanked 221 Times in 65 Posts

Default

I understand the process. Been there & done it many times.
David C Porter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:52 PM   #25
Member
Pitts Yandell
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

So all this being said is there an explanation for one source saying it wasn't born a 28 gauge and another authority says is was born a 28 gauge.
Pitts Yandell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 10:32 PM   #26
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,918
Thanks: 1,231
Thanked 5,085 Times in 1,455 Posts

Default

Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 11-15-2024, 10:50 PM   #27
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 177
Thanks: 30
Thanked 221 Times in 65 Posts

Default

It's obvious from your letter that it left the factory as a 28ga & some where down the road was sleeved with new tubes. To know if your doner barrel is original you need to look at the serial number on the barrel & see if it matches the serial number on the receiver water table. Also, is the number fonts the same on both.
David C Porter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 10:57 PM   #28
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,918
Thanks: 1,231
Thanked 5,085 Times in 1,455 Posts

Default

He should be happy it wasn't sleeved to a 20ga or 16ga.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread Yesterday, 09:13 AM   #29
Member
Pitts Yandell
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
The comment was solely based on this sentence from the first page, "The serial number 131429 is not on the list of 28-gauge guns from the records, published in The Parker Story, page 1005. So, it likely started life as an 0-frame 16- or 20-gauge." Not having the book I made some assumption about its authority.

The thread then continues on to find all possible evidence that it was "retubbed", thus leading to my confusion. So apologies if offense was taken.
Pitts Yandell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Yesterday, 10:46 AM   #30
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,964
Thanks: 6,395
Thanked 9,275 Times in 4,942 Posts

Default

The "list" of 28 gauges is only one of the sources available to the PGCA researcher. Maybe it's time to repost the article that explains how the research material was found and how it was put into its final form.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.