Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-28-2021, 09:45 PM   #21
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 3,345 Times in 675 Posts

Default

I had someone who I trust and knows a lot more about antique gunmakers and flintlocks than I do take a look at it. In my pictures the hammers are at half-cock. At full-cock they are a lot further back and he immediately said that it seemed like a long way for a hammer to travel to ignite a cap. His opinion was that it was a flintlock that had been converted.
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-29-2021, 10:13 AM   #22
Member
Double Trouble
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 289
Thanks: 57
Thanked 58 Times in 46 Posts

Default

That is a very valid point - I have heard that before.
Apparently, the greater distance through which the hammer falls (pivots) allows it to build up more speed & the flint will hit the frizzen with a faster (harder) strike.
All of this extra distance/speed is of no value to merely set off a percussion cap. Excess force will merely batter the nipples.
John Mazza is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mazza For Your Post:
Unread 12-29-2021, 12:24 PM   #23
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 3,345 Times in 675 Posts

Default

Thanks for the comments John, I know there are different views on this, but I would like to re-convert this back to a flintlock.

If you think about it, it was probably a flintlock for 25-50 years and a percussion for 125-150 years. I have been wanting an original/antique upland sxs flintlock and finding a good original is both hard and expensive. Converting this one back to flintlock would make it "correct" again and give me something nice I would actually use on occasion.

I need to find someone to do the reconversion and will do that after the new year. I think it will be a wonderful gun back as a flintlock.
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Oliver For Your Post:
Unread 03-31-2022, 09:58 PM   #24
Member
Joe Wood
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 163
Thanks: 146
Thanked 153 Times in 53 Posts

Default

Jay, IMO, your gun was definitely made as a flintlock. And it has the original Manton Style patent breech which is still there. Reconversion to flintlock would be discouraged. It can be done but a quality job by a real pro would probably cost in the vicinity of $5,000 to $10,000. Castings could be used but it would always look like a cobbled together piece and the reliability of the lock would be doubtful. An oxymoron is a “good, cheap flintlock”.
Joe Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Wood For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.