Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-20-2014, 06:29 PM   #21
Member
Dennis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Thanks: 48
Thanked 418 Times in 202 Posts

Default

David,

You have my sympathy for the destroyed Parker but thankfully you are not injured.

Dennis
Dennis V. Nix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 06:34 PM   #22
Member
Dennis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Thanks: 48
Thanked 418 Times in 202 Posts

Default

As I have read many times over since joining the PGCA these stocks are old and heavy loads should not be used in these old double guns. Possibly the load generated a much greater level of recoil than normal and that is what caused the stock to break at the wrist, the weakest part of the gun.

Dennis
Dennis V. Nix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 06:49 PM   #23
Member
Parker Bachelder (Brad's Profile)
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 296
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,928 Times in 203 Posts

Default

David

It is a blessing that no one was hurt in this accident. You are fortunate this did not occur with fluid steel barrels. Yes I am defending Damascus.
Without the gun in hand for testing, I can't make any definative statements, however, I can offer a cursory opinion. Only two things can cause this type of failure. An extremely over pressure shell or a rigid obstruction at the forcing cone. This type of ripping of the metal indicates a single event failure, not a mechanical or structural problem.
When fliud steel barrels are exposed this type of pressure they will usually demonstrate longitudinal cracking and more fragmentation with little or no bulging. The photos show considerable bulging prior to the metal shearing off. This attests to certain maleable property I have only seen in compostie steel Barrels. A lot less shrapnell and a more gradual release of pressure.
The stock breakage is due to gases escaping into the receiver via the firing pin hole.
The beautiful patterns are not the only reason that Damascus Barrels were considered Premium.

Brad
Brad Bachelder is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brad Bachelder's homepage!
Unread 02-20-2014, 06:56 PM   #24
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,664 Times in 2,672 Posts

Default

You might see some evidence of gas escape into the stock head through the hammer holes if you remove the stock head. I have seen barrel ruptures before without this back pressure that erupted into the head.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 02-20-2014, 07:44 PM   #25
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 956
Thanks: 1,428
Thanked 1,157 Times in 414 Posts

Default

Brad you are certainly more knowledgeable than me on this subject, however wouldn't the stock have split or blown at the head, instead of causing a 90 degree break across the grain at the grip?
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 07:51 PM   #26
Member
Fishtail
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 789
Thanks: 63
Thanked 510 Times in 253 Posts

Default

How could a stock break occur due to a much greater level of recoil when the load was a low-power load?
greg conomos is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 07:59 PM   #27
Member
paul stafford jr
Forum Associate
 
paul stafford jr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 261
Thanks: 130
Thanked 64 Times in 50 Posts

Default

my son has used 40 grains of 7625 in his Damascus ten gauge greeners with no problems this don't make sents
paul stafford jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 08:16 PM   #28
Member
David Yeatts
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 34
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts

Default

Thank you all for your opinions, suggestions, and good wishes. The main reason I was not injured, good safety glasses and gloves. I take a bit of ribbing once in a while but with out them my hand would have been cut.
Now on to a better description, the shell blew up, the only part we found was about half the plastic hull. I will continue to look for the brass head and the piece which blew off the barrel but rain and a lot of snow has kept the range closed. Back blase caused the gun to open, this back force plus the downward pressure snapped the stock. Everyone who saw it happen said the stock was broken before I dropped the gun. It was the top part of the stock and action which hit me.
The hull was a Federal and it have been reloaded a number of times and in eight or nine years the first to fail in any way. I have had other shells blow up on me (Cheddite is very bad I limit them to no more than 3 reloads) but the guns have remained intact. I have checked all 12 of the other hulls and all have there base wads and I broke the bird on 4 high. Could there have been an obstruction in the barrel, I do not know for sure. These are the things I know for sure.
I am going to get all three and the gun that are going to the Southern checked out by experts and two others are going to be sleeved one in 28 and the other in 410, never ever want a repeat. A lot of old hulls will also be hitting the dustbin.
Dave
The photo was correct the the left chamber was deformed
David Yeatts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to David Yeatts For Your Post:
Unread 02-20-2014, 08:52 PM   #29
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 774
Thanked 859 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Do you still have the hull that blew? Is the base wad intact?
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-20-2014, 09:32 PM   #30
Member
DoubleDown
Forum Associate
 
Mike.Smith's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 285
Thanks: 210
Thanked 811 Times in 142 Posts

Default

David, as others have said, sorry about the gun, but glad that you're ok.

So, how many reloads is too many for a hull ( I know it will vary per brand)? I tend to visually inspect my hulls before using them to check the brass and the ends for splits, etc. It sounds like this may not be good enough, and no matter how good the shell looks it should be discarded after a few uses?

Mike
__________________
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson
Mike.Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.