![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||||||
|
![]()
Brian, Dan looked at that Trojan too and said it looked like a Miller. The VHE also was single trigger in the order book. I find both triggers very interesting.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||||||
|
![]()
Those are new ones on me. All the MILLER single selective triggers I know look like this. Early style with the safety as the selector --
Early-style Miller on DHE 12-gauge 01.jpg Early-Style Miller on DHE 12-gauge 02.jpg and the later style with the rocker switch -- Late-style Miller on CHE 12-gauge.jpg |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||||||
|
![]()
I really don't understand the supposed issue with a Parker single trigger. Many of the trap Parkers have a single trigger {I do not know if the SBT and a SxS are the same} and trap shotguns are going to be shot multiples of times more than hunting models. So why would the Parker Brothers put out an inferior trigger in a gun that was meant for more shooting in a season than most guns in a hunting situation be shot in their owner's lifetime?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
The First Generation parker trigger for double guns was one that was invented by someone else and used under license by parker. It must have proven to be somewhat problematic over a short enough time because eventually James Hayes developed and implemented the Second generation design, which was of his own design. Some of the mechanics involving the selector are very similar to the first type. The inertia block is completely different. The second generation trigger was very reliable overall as it was never changed. And it is the same design that was used in the Parker Reproductions. It is in no way a simple mechanism. But, really not many of them are. The Miller is about a simple as it gets, which is why they have kind of gotten the reputation of being the most reliable or "best" SST out there (that was used on vintage guns). But, after nearly 100 years anything can become problematic and unreliable. I personally feel like a single trigger on a double gun is the absolutely dumbest thing going. They can be very complex mechanisms that are very problematic to repair and can be finicky at times to work correctly. Different loads or even different shooters can effect the performance of the trigger. Most barrel selectors are simply unsafe, and except for use on targets, they likely are never actually used much. There is no better or quicker barrel selector than just moving your finger from one trigger to the other. period.
__________________
B. Dudley |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||||||
|
![]()
Brian, I agree 100% with your comment. I would never order a SST for a SxS. I’m a fan of double triggers. It is a fix for a non-existent problem. Only reason I have these two is because they work, the guns really fit well and I can shoot them well too.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thanks to all who took the time to share their knowledge. Shipped out today from California. Delivery is on Monday (my father holds an FFL) I'll have my hands on it next weekend.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | ||||||
|
![]()
IMO Two barrels Two triggers ! Not that I am against a single trigger ( I have both types of guns ) I like what works !
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|