Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Single Barrel Trap Shotguns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-01-2014, 08:34 AM   #21
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,223 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Why aren't the barrels marked Acme Steel?....Dave?

I suspect it is because it is such an early SC.... possibly the first.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2014, 09:10 AM   #22
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,970
Thanks: 6,397
Thanked 9,279 Times in 4,944 Posts

Default

There are three singles earlier than yours in the Serialization Book, but there are many missing numbers in the 176,000 and 175,000 range that may include more single barrels. Your gun does not say Acme Steel because early singles did not have steel markings like the later ones. Your gun should have a T on the barrel flat, signifying that your barrel is made of Titanic Steel.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Forgot these
Unread 03-01-2014, 11:34 AM   #23
Member
Jack Purkis
PGCA Member
 
Jack Purkis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Thanks: 38
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts

Default Forgot these

Meant to upload these also. Although a little out of focus you can clearly see the "T"
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_6861.jpg (389.2 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_6863.jpg (414.7 KB, 4 views)
Jack Purkis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jack Purkis For Your Post:
Unread 03-03-2014, 12:36 PM   #24
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 4,561 Times in 1,372 Posts

Default

I would send the info on this gun to Josh Loewensteiner. The "Parkers Found" listing in the Parker Pages lists the earliest known SC Parker as serial number 176798. Your gun precedes this by 553 serial numbers.
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Franzen For Your Post:
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 03-03-2014, 12:42 PM   #25
Member
Jack Purkis
PGCA Member
 
Jack Purkis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Thanks: 38
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts

Default

I will send it in, thanks for the reminder!
Jack Purkis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jack Purkis For Your Post:
Unread 06-21-2014, 12:12 PM   #26
Member
George "Scott" Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 817
Thanks: 1,786
Thanked 1,444 Times in 393 Posts

Default

I have a SBT papered by PGCA which was completed according to Stock Book No. 63 on May 17, 1917. The serial number is 177962 it is a SC 12 gauge with 32 inch barrels. So I'm wondering if Parker made a group of SBT and then waited for an order and pulled the gun with the dimensions requested by the customer. The serial number would make my gun 109 numbers after the above mentioned SBT yet completed earlier. This kind of stuff helps build the mystery of Parkers!
George Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-21-2014, 12:56 PM   #27
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,918
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 5,085 Times in 1,455 Posts

Default

Jack, very nice gun but I'm wondering why no checkered cheek panel? More pictures of the checkering to include the border may help determine if the stocks are original.

Scott, I looked up the Research Letter on your gun. The Stock Book does show 8 SC's made in a row starting with 177960 and ending with 177968 so they did make a run of SC's in May of 1917. It is also listed as a straight grip stock! The Order Book shows that the order for 177962 was placed on September 26, 1918 and shipped on October 26, 1918 to DuPont. The stock was a pistol grip Monte Carlo. My guess is that the gun was either sitting in the warehouse until it was ordered and at that time, they converted it to a pistol grip, or it was a demonstration gun that was returned at some time and Parker reconditioned it and put on the pistol grip stock, then sold it when an order for a SC with 32 inch barrels was placed.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 06-22-2014, 10:16 AM   #28
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,970
Thanks: 6,397
Thanked 9,279 Times in 4,944 Posts

Default

The buttstock could be a replacement. The plain, uncheckered cheeks are a clue.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-22-2014, 01:09 PM   #29
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,789
Thanks: 504
Thanked 18,654 Times in 4,780 Posts

Default

I was wondering about the stock myself. The checkering and the shape in some spots is suspect. But the butt seems to match the forend perfectly. Looks like the same piece of wood.

The sides of the barrels would not be roll stamped with the makers mark on these early guns. Instead, the vent rib was hand engraved with the makers mark like the vent rib doubles. I see the barrel flat has a "T" on it, but not in a circle. Maybe supposed to be Titanic??? Interesting that the engraved makers mark has no steel type listed.

Your gun has some of the interesting early features such as the firing pin access screw in the right side and the more sparse (nicer in my opinion) engraving. The later ones were covered with stippling in between the scroll and it really hides the case color.

If you stock is original, it has clearly been cut short, which is very common on these guns.

And the 30" length is pretty rare.

Nice find!
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 06-22-2014, 10:00 PM   #30
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,970
Thanks: 6,397
Thanked 9,279 Times in 4,944 Posts

Default

Yup, the early single traps had Titanic barrels.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.