Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-09-2023, 01:08 PM   #21
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,367
Thanks: 3,179
Thanked 12,345 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Contractors in the barrel department at Parker Bros would hold the barrels up to a light source, like a window with an opaque covering, and ‘regulate’ the tubes together this way. I believe they would simply thump them with their fist as a hammer.
I assume you mean when they were wired, but not yet soldered.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2023, 01:11 PM   #22
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,072
Thanks: 36,781
Thanked 34,213 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

I don’t think anybody can answer that question beyond speculation.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2023, 07:49 PM   #23
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,367
Thanks: 3,179
Thanked 12,345 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

Maybe not, but surely you could take an educated guess. I sure hope my soldered and finished barrels can take a fist thumpin without changes the POI.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2023, 09:41 PM   #24
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,072
Thanks: 36,781
Thanked 34,213 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

I don’t know.. I read a story where a side-by-side shotgun had always shot way to low and the young owner complained of this to an old-time gunsmith. The old timer took the gun, sat on a stump and laid it across his spread apart knees and thumped it a couple of times then said “Try it now.” And the pattern had come up but not quite enough. A repeat performance by the old-timer brought the pattern right where it should be… Keeping in mind that this is a story from within the pages of a sporting book.

Maybe yes - Maybe no…





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2023, 10:47 PM   #25
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 3,720
Thanked 6,721 Times in 1,310 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Contractors in the barrel department at Parker Bros would hold the barrels up to a light source, like a window with an opaque covering, and ‘regulate’ the tubes together this way. I believe they would simply thump them with their fist as a hammer.

.
Parker Brothers may have done some of what I describe here differently, but typical American maker practice was to straighten each barrel tube after it was drilled and first-pass reamed. A heavy wire or rod was placed horizontally across a frosted glass mounted in front of a window or source of light. Any crookedness in the shadow line indicated to the so-called "setter" just where to spring the tube to straighten it. Earlier on this was done judiciously with a hammer and later the practice evolved to using a mechanical press.

The next operation was to put the individual tube in a lathe and turn its exterior to approximate finished size and contour. Often it was necessary to re-straighten the bore as described because the removal of metal may have released internal stresses.

Double shotgun regulation was done after the tubes were tinned (exterior dip coating of molten solder). Both tubes were "mated" and held together by pieces of metal soldered between them and at fixed intervals to hold the tubes the correct distance apart. Great care was taken to see that the tubes were in the same plane and were properly adjusted to regulate and thus prevent cross-firing. Lastly the top rib, bottom ribs and loop lug were put in place, held together by wire wrapping and wedges. Then the assembly was heated in a furnace with powdered rosin or a soldering flux applied along with some additional solder.

Afterwards the bores and chokes were finish reamed and polished using increasingly larger diameter bore reamers, a choking (tapered) reamer and finally a pack reamer and polishing rod.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 12-10-2023, 09:18 AM   #26
Member
Stan Hillis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,847
Thanks: 3,618
Thanked 4,311 Times in 1,227 Posts

Default

The regulation of double barreled guns has fascinated me for many years, mostly that of shotguns, as opposed to double rifles. I became aware that not all double barreled shotguns are properly regulated with just any old load early on. Some cannot be found to print the individual patterns atop each other with ANY load but often, when a side by side shotgun crossfires, all that is needed for perfect regulation of the patterns is to try different weight payloads and velocities.

This is just personal observation, but most often when one cross-fires badly it is because the payload is too light and/or the velocity too high. The last example I ran into is my dedicated quail and woodcock gun, a Philadelphia Fox 20 SWE. I wanted to use 7/8 oz. loads in it so when I first patterned it that's what I tried. They were running at about 1200 fps, as i recall. To my chagrin it cross-fired to the tune of 8" at about 20 yards, equally so with both barrels. I was sick when I saw that. Turns out that all it wanted was 1 oz. loads at about 1150 fps to put those sweet patterns right on top of each other at POA.
Stan Hillis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post:
Unread 12-10-2023, 09:52 AM   #27
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,072
Thanks: 36,781
Thanked 34,213 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Thanks Frank for taking the time to go into the detail of the process that I didn’t take the time to explain, especially about the stationary wire to look through the tubes at. This is all explained in TPS as well. Again, thank you.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-10-2023, 11:02 AM   #28
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,367
Thanks: 3,179
Thanked 12,345 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

Frank, What is a 'pack reamer'? Same as PAC reamer ?
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2023, 01:37 PM   #29
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 3,720
Thanked 6,721 Times in 1,310 Posts

Default

Edgar, the so-called "pack" reamer was used for slow scraping or burnishing of the bores and chokes. It cut away very little metal and left them with a smooth surface and ready for the polishing rod. See attached pic which may be greatly expanded.

For info, this and my preceding reply are excerpts from my second to last DGJ article which was in the Summer 2022 issue when its plug was pulled. I requested both to be returned, and some day I may find another publisher for both.
.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Boring 17-1.jpg (68.4 KB, 2 views)
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 12-10-2023, 02:07 PM   #30
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,367
Thanks: 3,179
Thanked 12,345 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Srebro View Post
Edgar, the so-called "pack" reamer was used for slow scraping or burnishing of the bores and chokes. It cut away very little metal and left them with a smooth surface and ready for the polishing rod. See attached pic which may be greatly expanded.

For info, this and my preceding reply are excerpts from my second to last DGJ article which was to be in the Summer 2022 issue when the plug was pulled. I requested both to be returned, and some day I may find another publisher for both.
.
I sincerely hope you are able to publish it, as I find this fills in some blanks for me. I have found other references to a fine cutting/ burnishing tool, but not as it pertains to Parker Brothers.
I am especially interested in the tools which were 'expanded' by use of wedges, or shims. Peter Johnson references such tools in his book. The British also used tools, employing hardwood for increasing the cutting diameter.
Lastly, I was under the possibly false assumption the the ribs were not part of the initial soldering process, but installed in a second operation, because of the use of different, or softer solders.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.