|
11-06-2015, 12:58 PM | #23 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
11-09-2015, 01:37 PM | #24 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
11-09-2015, 01:46 PM | #25 | ||||||
|
I assume you are referring to me- George Purtill.
Bill Murphy's post says what I meant. A gun with a serial number of 242055 would seen unlikely to be in such bad shape as to need a full restoration. Plus it is not a field gun that would be beat up. Trap guns are shot a lot but not usually abused. Most all of my guns in the 240,000 plus range are mint. |
||||||
11-09-2015, 01:52 PM | #26 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
11-09-2015, 03:05 PM | #27 | ||||||
|
I think I have that catalog in my files. Now I gotta check this evening
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
Catalog |
11-09-2015, 03:44 PM | #28 | ||||||
|
Catalog
Thanks Dave Noreen.
Very nice. Now I need one for my reference collection. This is the tail end on Remington's association/marketing of Parker guns. That is why 242055 is a gun that either would have been unmolested and not in need of restoration or very likely as Bill Murphy said, made from what was on hand at a later date. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post: |
trap 242055 |
11-09-2015, 07:50 PM | #29 | ||||||
|
trap 242055
Regardless of how the gun came into being , it is a Parker treasure to be sure! it doesn't have to be a AA grade gun to be beautiful , and the fact that it was at the end of an era when the last Parkers were made by Remington ,
makes the gun more intriguing. Take good care of it , and enjoy it. Dave Kerns PGCA member 1691. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to davidkerns For Your Post: |
11-09-2015, 09:01 PM | #30 | ||||||
|
Mr. Noreen, Thank you for reminding me of this great catalog. I found mine and it has the foldouts in the back for skeet and trap fields also.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
|
|