Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-05-2012, 06:24 PM   #11
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,469
Thanks: 6,720
Thanked 9,816 Times in 5,209 Posts

Default

I agree with Edgar. The wood is very V Grade skeetish, especially the forend.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2012, 07:44 PM   #12
Member
Mike Murphy
Forum Associate
 
Michael Murphy's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 184
Thanks: 636
Thanked 47 Times in 33 Posts

Default

oops! deleted reply

Last edited by Michael Murphy; 08-05-2012 at 11:27 PM.. Reason: Deleted
Michael Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 12:37 PM   #13
Member
Bob beach
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 248 Times in 23 Posts

Default

Parker 239502 was received at Abercrombie & Fitch on November 30, 1936. The shotgun is in the ledger as a VHE Skeet grade with a full pistol grip and a LOP of 14 5/16 inches. The price of the gun was $143.85 which was the catalog price in 1936 for a VHE Skeet grade with a single trigger.

Compliments of Griffin & Howe, Inc.

Bob Beach
Records Archivist
Robert Beach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Robert Beach For Your Post:
Unread 08-06-2012, 01:13 PM   #14
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,045
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 5,407 Times in 1,505 Posts

Default

It's a skeet gun, but the BTFE mystery remains, error in the Serialization book perhaps.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 08-06-2012, 01:22 PM   #15
Member
Opening Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,108 Times in 1,202 Posts

Default

Pete remember there are many errors in the "Book"
Eric Eis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 01:42 PM   #16
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

If a person had a genuine interest in the gun, it wouldn't take much to remove the forend iron and determine if the forend wood has the proper serial number. While I appreciate that a skilled counterfeitor can duplicate that too, I believe that such counterfeiting is rare. There is lots of discussion about whether the forend is right or not. To my eye, it has the proper narrow , barrel hugging configuration for a late beavertail forend, which look different than the earlier, blocky beavertails. The serial number in the forend wood will tell you whether the wood is factory or not, and to me as long as it is factory work, I would not care when it was done. I have also seen many thin recoil pads on late guns, and can provide provide photos if needed. The leather facing is unusual, but Parker offered leather faced thin pads, and whether it is factory leather faced would not be consequential to me.

If a person was a serious Parker collector of skeet guns, I think this gun merits interested consideration . The price is always open to negotiation but if a person is never willing to pay the price, he seldom gets what he wants.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 03:26 PM   #17
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,849
Thanks: 38,446
Thanked 35,765 Times in 13,107 Posts

Default

After examining all of the details of every picture it certainly looks like the "real deal" to me. Nothing about that gun raises any questions I can think of.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 05:36 PM   #18
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
After examining all of the details of every picture it certainly looks like the "real deal" to me. Nothing about that gun raises any questions I can think of.
Sensei has spoken.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 05:54 PM   #19
Member
Blind Dog
Forum Associate
 
Fred Preston's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 636
Thanks: 424
Thanked 399 Times in 193 Posts

Default

I have #238528, a 12ga VHE 1&1/2 frame, 26" "skeet in-skeet out" bbls. w/ 2&1/2' chambers, SST, PG, BTFE. It's slightly older than the subject piece, but the BTFE is "blocky" to my eye (original w/ reenforcing rod and the "tough lug"). I've used it hunting with an SFE from another VHE to look cool, but it doesn't balance well; needs the heavy lumber. Will get out the camera to post some pics if anyone wants.

Last edited by Fred Preston; 08-06-2012 at 05:58 PM.. Reason: foregot chamber specs
Fred Preston is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2012, 06:51 PM   #20
Member
Blind Dog
Forum Associate
 
Fred Preston's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 636
Thanks: 424
Thanked 399 Times in 193 Posts

Default

Just checked the S&I book for #239602 (if that's the right # for the subject gun) and it shows ejectors and SST as extras, no BTFE. Also, says it's a 20ga.

I looked at the watertable pic again and the # may be 239502 in which case it is listed with the same extras (no BTFE), but is a 12ga.

Last edited by Fred Preston; 08-06-2012 at 08:44 PM.. Reason: possibly 239502
Fred Preston is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.