Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register: Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
I believe the original 'study' claimed that ducks in the wild were ingesting lead shot and dying. I think that the study was subsequently discredited. I always figured the raptors would be the real victims. I know that I was getting an unacceptable number of wounded birds so I went looking for something better. For me shell costs are irrelevant as the ducks have disappeared from this area (S.E. Colo.) over the last 10 or so years. I have been checked a few times but have not been asked to show my ammo.
C.G.B.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Carl G. Bachhuber For Your Post:
My understanding is that the study was based on overutilized areas like state game areas, where there was a lot of shooting. Can't imagine it would ever be an issue on a lightly shot area
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
01-08-2022, 08:55 AM
Linear Mode
