![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
Dean a letter came with the Fox stating it was an exhibition gun and it is on James's list.Bobby
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Robert Brooks For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||||||
|
![]()
Maybe this is a reason not to. The PGCA forum is a good place to be, and we keep it that way.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
The picayune reason is simply that the narrow minded objectors foresaw lost revenue from research letters. This is infinitesimally unlikely, as it would have required a living owner of one of those guns to see it on the PGCA site, and copy it as a satisfactory replacement to a real letter from their ASSociation.
Some people have nothing better to do than exercise their barely measurable authority. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|