![]() |
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#13 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#14 | ||||||
|
The ribs were attached before striking.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#15 | ||||||
|
This set I mention is stamped 4 - 2.
When I put it on the scale along with a top rib and rib extension the weight is 3 lbs. 14 oz. When I add in an unfinished forend iron, the weight comes up to 4 lbs. 2 oz. I am just providing the info on this particular New (unfinished) barrel set that I have here. In previous discussions here, which I was not involved in, it was suggested that MAYBE the stamped weight factored in the typical weight of a FE iron into the mix. a number of people weighed their barrels with complete forends attached and the weights came relatively close to the stamped numbers. This is what leads me to think that there MIGHT be something to this idea... But... I wasn't there of course so that is all I can say.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#16 | ||||||
|
See http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=17928
Imagine how much barrel weight had to be removed in the contouring/finishing process. A significant amount I suspect. I also suspect that barrel making in those days was not an exacting process. It was up to the skilled barrel finisher to make a set fit the parameters for a given gun. Some required quite a bit of metal removal and some not so much. The weight stamp probably helped with the selection of a set of barrels for a given application, minimizing the work required. Even back in those days time = money. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Gary Laudermilch For Your Post: |
|
|
#17 | ||||||
|
I will post pictures tonight.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
|
|
#18 | ||||||
|
I weighted my Parkers barrels + forend with the following results
marked weight VH 20 26" 3 3 .1 VH 20 28" 3-3 3 2.6 VHE 20 30" 3-7 3 8 VHE 12 30" 4 3 12.9 GH 12 26" 3-10 3 4.9 DH 12 26" 3-9 3 5.8 The 3 20 ga guns were almost spot on but all 3 12ga were light |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#19 | ||||||
|
That last post did not post as I typed it, the first # for weight was the marked weight after that the real weight Jim
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#20 | ||||||
|
Other than the serial number, is the weight information the most consistent set of marks stamped into the gun? I'm talking early to late production consistency.
__________________
Spin Drift War Damn Eagle Molon Labe |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|