Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-16-2015, 09:52 AM   #11
Member
Jean Swanson
PGCA Invincible
Life Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 376
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1,082 Times in 237 Posts

Default

Do not forget Parker Brothers made around 5--- 20 bore single barrel trap guns of which I passed one up in Las Vegas some 30 plus years ago for $1500 , because I was told and thought Parker only made 12 bores in single barrel trap guns.

To answer John's question----yes----Parker was in the business to SELL guns !!

Allan
Jean Swanson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jean Swanson For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2015, 12:02 PM   #12
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,979
Thanks: 38,718
Thanked 35,953 Times in 13,175 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
I am sure they would have if a customer wanted one. But i doubt it would be on anything smaller than an 0 frame since that is the smallest hammer gun frame that was built up till then.

The serial number on this 20-gauge Lifter is 10165 and the pin separation is 18MM which translates to less than 13/16" which is the 0000-frame size. In fact, it is more than 1/16" smaller - which would make it slightly smaller than a 00000-frame size... if Parker had ever even made such a frame size. The frame sizes were determined by firing pin separation at the breech face and are incremental by sixteenths of an inch. The 0-frame has a pin separation of 1" exactly. The 00-frame has a separation of 15/16" exactly... and so on.

My point is that Parker Bros. could have easily made a .410, even in a lifter, if they so desired. That bore size was certainly being made in the British Isles at that time.


.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0018.jpg (323.2 KB, 1 views)
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2015, 02:00 PM   #13
Member
Eric Estes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 338
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 219 Times in 113 Posts

Default

Never say never. One could turn up yet. There are a lot of missing records as Mills pointed out. Wouldn't that be something!
Eric Estes is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2015, 02:22 PM   #14
Member
John Truitt
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 965
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 1,075 Times in 338 Posts

Default

Dean,

Is that an early lifter that does not have the recessed hinge pin?

Would smaller frames like you are referring to been more likely found in that very early period?
John Truitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2015, 02:50 PM   #15
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,979
Thanks: 38,718
Thanked 35,953 Times in 13,175 Posts

Default

Here it is John. It is an enigma as far as its features and configuration are concerned, but it does letter.




.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0058.jpg (290.5 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0005.jpg (483.9 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0021.jpg (289.1 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0032.jpg (499.9 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0033.jpg (316.6 KB, 3 views)
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2015, 03:45 PM   #16
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,555
Thanks: 6,771
Thanked 9,905 Times in 5,259 Posts

Default

Think of how difficult it was for the Skeuse family to build a small frame hammerless Parker with ejectors, cocking slides, complex floorplates, single triggers, you name it. How easy it would have been to build a 28-.410 hammer combo gun on an 0 frame.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2015, 03:57 PM   #17
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,450
Thanks: 14,702
Thanked 12,644 Times in 4,525 Posts

Default

It even looks like a 410 frame
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2015, 03:58 PM   #18
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,450
Thanks: 14,702
Thanked 12,644 Times in 4,525 Posts

Default

I wonder how much it would take to have a second set of barrels manufactured in 28 gauge or 410?
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2015, 04:00 PM   #19
Member
John Truitt
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 965
Thanks: 1,887
Thanked 1,075 Times in 338 Posts

Default

that is awesome. Thank you for sharing the images and info on the gun.

It is cool how they integrated the smaller breach balls with the step for cosmetics. I really like that design.

Parker did some very interesting things. Thanks again for sharing. That is one very cool piece.

Thanks for all the info guys.
John Truitt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Truitt For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2015, 05:59 PM   #20
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,076
Thanks: 532
Thanked 19,767 Times in 4,985 Posts

Default

Dean,

Wouldn't that gun be considered a sort of pre-courser to the 0 frame, when the few orders for 20g. guns were filled on a one-off basis before a standard small bore frame was made?

A lot of the VERY early Parker lifters (first couple 1,000 S/Ns) of larger gauges measure all sorts of odd sizes since standard frame sizes were not yet established.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.