![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#13 | ||||||
|
uh . . . make that Sporting Classics magazine
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#14 | ||||||
|
Jim Casada is probably the foremost authority on Rutledge and he is working on a biography.
His early poetry is very good as well. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#15 | ||||||
|
Decided to wait on this book for now, but did pick up a 1st edition of Home by the River.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#16 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post: |
|
|
#17 | ||||||
|
Not quite starting, already read and loved Home and the Southern Heartland or whatever it is called. Reading Buckingham at the moment, and while they write a lot of the same topics, they do present them completely differently. Rutledge seems more on the hunt and a storyteller, Buckingham is more of a 1st hand account style and more about the actual people then the hunts themselves.
Enjoying both immensely, just find the differences between them surprising/entertaining. As a boy who was brought up on Uncle Remus, I am quite in my element.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|