![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Stock split | ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
Please pardon my ignorance but I am looking for the split. Please help me locate it.
There seems to be a gap to the right of the tang that might would indicate a crack at the back of the tang. I have not bought it. The seller is swearing that the colors are original but I always doubt parker colors. He also claims 90% but I don't see it. Especially with the fore arm damage and a possible stock split. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
I see that!
Thank you! I am assuming this is about a $3500 gun? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||||||
|
![]()
That would be between you and the seller. He hasn't reduced his price in about two years. Apparently he is convinced it is original. I suspect he bought it as "original".
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||||||
|
![]()
If a gun was shot or used enough to get a stock split I'd think it wouldn't have case colors quite that strong. I suppose it could have gotten damaged the first day the guy took it out but that's a stretch......
Destry
__________________
I was as virtuously given as a gentleman need to be; virtuous enough; swore little; diced not above seven times a week; went to a bawdy-house once in a quarter--of an hour; paid money that I borrowed, three of four times; lived well and in good compass: and now I live out of all order, out of all compass. Falstaff - Henry IV |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||||||
|
![]()
Right Destry, and the fact that there is significant oil staining in the wood supports what you said. Especially in the forend wood which is probably original to the gun.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||||||
|
![]()
perhaps a research letter would reveal some more info?
and, if the receiver has been rehardened, then that opens up a can of worms, re: the single trigger...parker single triggers are suspect enough without introducing the potential problems of receiver warpage and the necessity to refit the trigger and related parts... but a nice looking gun, never the less. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||||||
|
![]()
is there a thru bolt length wise in the forend? if not, then that is a big clue that the beaver tail forend is not factory.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|