Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-16-2018, 10:40 AM   #11
Member
Mike Hunter
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 10 Posts

Default

Gentlemen,

Thank you very much, you made week.

I had picked the Parker up as part of a larger bundle, I has assumed, due to the odd barrel length that the barrels had been cut. Had it on my table at Tulsa for a couple of shows, each time a prospective buyer measure the barrels, they were declared cut.

Nose went up and they walked away.

After the last week’s Tulsa show I made the decision that I was going to keep the Parker, I’m glad I did
Mike Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2018, 10:44 AM   #12
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 1,382
Thanked 3,346 Times in 675 Posts

Default

I figured I was safe if they were longer not shorter as listed in the serialization book. Mine was an earlier gun from 1877. Here are some pics, and it is more like 29 5/8". Hopefully, Mike you'll find out the same with your gun.

I had always assumed that Parker had some left over odd length barrels that they wanted/needed to use. Or barrels were damaged in the production process and ended up being shorter than expected.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 77Lifter-1.jpg (114.3 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg 77Lifter-2.jpg (158.2 KB, 2 views)
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2018, 11:41 AM   #13
Member
Brush Buster
PGCA Member
Second Badge
 
Russ Jackson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,240
Thanks: 3,319
Thanked 3,656 Times in 1,121 Posts

Default

Very nice !
Russ Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2018, 12:01 PM   #14
Member
Joe D.
PGCA Member
 
Joe Dreisch's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 569
Thanks: 3,680
Thanked 874 Times in 286 Posts

Default

Mike, I am curious. The book had a "P" in the stock column. Is yours a round knob stock?
Joe Dreisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2018, 12:16 PM   #15
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,772
Thanks: 502
Thanked 18,596 Times in 4,768 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Hunter View Post
SN 60452

leading edge of bead to muzzle is .1730

Matting ends at leading edge of bead.


Your serial number DOES book as a 26" gun.

A Research letter accompanying the gun would make a sale a LOT easier.

Photos of the muzzle end would still be appreciated .
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 11-16-2018, 12:55 PM   #16
Member
Mike Hunter
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 10 Posts

Default

Well this one is no longer for sale, it’s going into my collection. My first Parker…whooo, hooo.

Well, unless you count the Chas Parker vise sitting on my workbench

Pistol grip with round knob.

I like it, 26 inch barrels make for a nice handling shotgun… my others are 28 or 30.

Typical silver/brown gun with no major issue that I can see. I’ll put together a wall thickness gage tonight.

Another question on chambers, it has a lip between chambers and bore, not the typical taper found on later shotguns…. I’m assuming it was chambered for brass shells?

I shoot RST 2 ½ in my other 12 gage doubles, I’m assuming 2 inch shells for this, room for the plastic case to unfold?

Photo’s coming…soon
Mike Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Hunter For Your Post:
Unread 11-16-2018, 04:37 PM   #17
Member
Austin J Hawthorne Jr.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 594
Thanks: 444
Thanked 393 Times in 204 Posts

Default

Mike,
You should be fine with 2 1/2 inch RST's. All the brass shells I have are longer than that, and the shell length is measured after firing.
Austin J Hawthorne Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2018, 06:18 PM   #18
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 2,032
Thanked 3,366 Times in 1,158 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I’ve never seen barrels that measure 5/8” or even 1/2” longer than their recorded length.

I learn something new every day here.





.
Someone obviously lengthened the barrels.
; )
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to todd allen For Your Post:
Unread 11-17-2018, 08:41 AM   #19
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,950
Thanks: 6,387
Thanked 9,263 Times in 4,937 Posts

Default

It's strange that a potential Parker buyer would travel all the way to Tulsa and not have a Serialization Book in his kit bag. That would be like showing up without a bore micrometer.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.