Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-23-2009, 07:27 AM   #11
Member
Nathan Ikert
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

I phoned him last night and he told me that the serial# on the frame, barrels and forearm all match # 76844. The v stamped on the barrel flats doe that stand for vulcan and if so would they put vulcan barrels on a DHE? This is a very nice gun wouldn't mined owning it some day if it the real thing.
Nathan Ikert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2009, 07:53 AM   #12
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,880
Thanks: 6,326
Thanked 9,187 Times in 4,902 Posts

Default

It is not unusual for PB to install Vulcan Steel barrels on a higher grade gun. The question is "Did PB install the barrels on this gun?". The character of the stamped numbers, the quality of fit, and some other factors enter into valuation and proved originality. Pictures will show us whether the ejectors were of Parker design. A PGCA letter may document every modification as original.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2009, 12:33 PM   #13
Member
Nathan Ikert
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

It might be 4-5 weeks before I see the gun again, but the next time I go I will take a camera. Is there any other things I should be taking a closer look at?
Nathan Ikert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2009, 01:01 PM   #14
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,947
Thanks: 36,433
Thanked 33,951 Times in 12,570 Posts

Default

What is the marking on the top rib, Titanic Steel or Vulcan Steel ? Depending on when it was sent back, either before 1897 where it couldn't have Titanic Steel and Vulcan Steel may have been the only lower priced fluid steel barrels available at the time. If the fluid steel barrels were fitted after 1897 it could have been Titanic but maybe the owner opted for the less expensive Vulcan barrels.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2009, 01:11 PM   #15
Member
George Lander
Forum Associate
 
George Lander's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 728 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Nathan: Dean is right. What kind of steel is marked on the top rib? If it was done by Parker it should be "Titanic Steel" A close inspection of the serial numbers should tell you if the re-barreling was done by Parker. How is the overall fit of the barrels to the receiver?
What serial number is on the forearm iron?

Best Regards, George
George Lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2009, 02:56 PM   #16
Member
Nathan Ikert
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

Had an other chance to look at the 16 ga. It is not a DHE it is a DH Vulcan steel barrels all serial # match. The thing that bothers me is the trigger guard, the engraving is much sharper an there is an N infrount of the serial # N76844 is that normal. He tells me that he will get a letter to prove that is original. I guess we will see what happens
Nathan Ikert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2009, 03:39 PM   #17
Member
George Lander
Forum Associate
 
George Lander's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 728 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Nathan: The Parker serialization book lists the gun76844 as a "D3" or D Grade 12 gauge gun with 30 inch Damascus barrels. It could be that the Vulcan Steel barrels were fitted by Parker to replace the original Damascus barrels. The gun also is listed as an extractor and not an ejector. What is the frame size (should appear on the bottom of the barrel lug)? A PGCA letter would be a good investment for either you or the seller.

Best Regards, George
George Lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2009, 03:46 PM   #18
Member
Nathan Ikert
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

# 1 frame, straight stock.
Nathan Ikert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-10-2009, 04:17 PM   #19
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,880
Thanks: 6,326
Thanked 9,187 Times in 4,902 Posts

Default

The "N" prefix is common on early guns.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-12-2009, 05:51 AM   #20
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,947
Thanks: 36,433
Thanked 33,951 Times in 12,570 Posts

Default

It is actually an "No". You will notice an "o" bisected by the upswept vertical line of the N creating a stylized No, the abbreviation of "number".
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.