|
02-19-2021, 09:01 AM | #13 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
02-19-2021, 10:04 AM | #14 | ||||||
|
Gun guys should consider themselves lucky in holding the line on nomenclature, compared with what is going on in the marine/boating community. It has become a lost cause, I am afraid, with owners and their crews talking of “driving” their boats; of going “upstairs” or “downstairs”; the “bathroom” down below; the “front” or “back” of the boat; and “parking” them.
“Floors” are now stood on, not decks; or the cockpit or cabin sole. It may be coming, but at least I haven’t yet heard a commercial or private plane pilot refer to “driving” his plane or an equipment operator speak of “driving” a back-hoe, at least when he is digging, as opposed to going down the highway. O. K. I feel better now. Back to guns.
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19 |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Russell E. Cleary For Your Post: |
02-20-2021, 12:51 PM | #15 | ||||||
|
The permutations of the English language are frustrating, especially in the specialty areas like guns and boats that have several hundred years of specialized use. People without an appreciation for the history of language grow more numerous every year. On the other hand, without permutations we would all still be saying "Wan that Abril with his shoures soute..." Oh well. Bolt plate and keels they are.
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Poindexter For Your Post: |
02-20-2021, 04:07 PM | #16 | ||||||
|
I agree Mike but I don't think we should be inventing new words without their being included in a dictionary with their spelling and definition and with an "origin" or at least a reference to the root word before we begin putting them into use.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
02-20-2021, 07:41 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
Still refer to the floors in my house....too long in the Navy I guess.
|
||||||
02-26-2021, 08:40 AM | #18 | ||||||
|
Can the 1910 style "wear plate" be used to replace the earlier 1905 style.
Bob Jurewicz |
||||||
02-26-2021, 08:47 AM | #19 | ||||||
|
Yes Bob. Parker Bros replaced earlier versions as a matter of course and a courtesy improvement when a gun went in for other kinds of service and repair and at no charge to the owner.
I have an 1893 GHE that went back to Meriden in 1913 to have ejectors installed and it now has the shouldered plate and bolt with no mention of this service in my letter. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
03-01-2021, 03:32 PM | #20 | ||||||
|
Not without also changing out the bolt to correspond with the plate. BUT... I do believe that the 1905 plates are thicker than the 1910 style, so I am not sure if the 1910 plate can be put into the 1905-1910 barrels without them being too low to mate up with the bolt. In this case, a fatter 1910 style plate would have to be used/made.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|