|
12-14-2020, 03:02 PM | #13 | ||||||
|
That would be my thought. I did that on the Fox gun. I never did that to a Parker but I would think it should work. If I’m wrong someone will be sure to chime in.
|
||||||
12-15-2020, 01:00 PM | #14 | ||||||
|
I read on a different thread that you can put much weaker springs in to power the ejector hammers thereby retaining full travel with very little force which would make shell removal easier with gloves on and keep it from breaking. Now all I need is a couple of weaker springs.
|
||||||
12-16-2020, 08:59 AM | #15 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I am not too sure about that.
__________________
B. Dudley |
|||||||
01-21-2021, 03:13 PM | #16 | |||||||
|
Quote:
True, things can go wrong with ejectors, but I only had one Parker with ejector issues, an early GHE. Maybe I'm lucky. It boils down to a matter of personal preference.' |
|||||||
01-21-2021, 04:03 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
Did original Parkers have the radius which you created?
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am" |
||||||
01-21-2021, 04:24 PM | #18 | ||||||
|
Yes they did John - it was the Repros that eliminated the radius. To save manufacturing expense? Or did they just miss that little intricacy... who knows.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|