Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-26-2016, 06:53 PM   #11
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 3,123
Thanked 10,898 Times in 1,725 Posts

Default

Austin: Thanks so much, no printing on the top wad so as you said it is a handload 3" shell. Thanks all!! I learn so much every day from these forums!! So one more question for you experts, would a 3" shell be used in a Parker chambered for 2 7/8"????
Craig Larter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2016, 09:46 AM   #12
Member
Austin J Hawthorne Jr.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 590
Thanks: 444
Thanked 393 Times in 204 Posts

Default

It could....but not knowing the components of the shell this thread is discussing....I would not try that one.
Austin J Hawthorne Jr. is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2016, 12:34 PM   #13
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,695
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 8,120 Times in 2,435 Posts

Default

In theory, if a Parker was ordered "chambered for 2 7/8 inch shell" the actual chamber would be 2 3/4 inch. If it was ordered with a 2 7/8 inch chamber, that would be for a 3-inch shell. We probably agonize way too much over these chamber length differences, as the "finding out for myself" series in The Double Gun Journal suggests that as much as 1/4 inch doesn't mean much.

It sure seems to me that the old Pigeon shooters and waterfowlers who ordered these guns chambered for the long 12-gauge shells in the old days must have shot them all up, where as the sporty waterfowl hunters using long 20-gauge shells must have died with a good supply of shells on hand. My gun room is accumulating a good selection of early 2 7/8 inch and 3-inch 20s, but the boxes of long 12-gauge shells are eluding me.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 08-27-2016, 05:25 PM   #14
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 3,123
Thanked 10,898 Times in 1,725 Posts

Default

There's no way I would fire a 100 year old shell. However, it is fun to think about what it was like shooting that Roman candle.
Craig Larter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2016, 10:28 PM   #15
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,695
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 8,120 Times in 2,435 Posts

Default

In the period from the mid-1880s until after WW-I, many shooters used shotgun shells loaded by their local gun stores. The shipping costs were a significant part of the price of shotgun shells back in the day, so shipping the much lighter NPEs or even in the case of Peters Cartridge Co. they catalogued their various shells just loaded with the powder and wads, ready for the local folks to put in their shot and crimp the shells. The biggest outfit loading shells in the west was Selby in San Francisco, California.



CHALLENGE was UMCs new primed empty equal to their NITRO CLUB loaded shell.

Here in Spokane we had Ware Bros. This 10-gauge shell is a 1901 LEADER --

Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 08-28-2016, 10:27 AM   #16
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 3,578
Thanked 6,083 Times in 1,476 Posts

Default

Here is an example of my 8 gauge Leader shells. Marking showing 1900 and 1902.

Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2016, 10:29 AM   #17
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 3,578
Thanked 6,083 Times in 1,476 Posts

Default




Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phillip Carr For Your Post:
Unread 08-28-2016, 01:56 PM   #18
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,695
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 8,120 Times in 2,435 Posts

Default

July 17, 1900, is the date of U.S. Patent No. 653,953, granted to John Gardner and assigned to Winchester Repeating Arms Co., for a primer. The other date appears to be July 14, 190? to my eye. Patents weren't issued on July 14, 1902, that week they were issued on the 15th. In that your 8-gauge Winchester LEADER shells appear to have the New No. 4 primer, they are from after 1904.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2016, 02:27 PM   #19
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 3,578
Thanked 6,083 Times in 1,476 Posts

Default

I used a 10x on the label it is 1903.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2016, 07:28 PM   #20
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,695
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 8,120 Times in 2,435 Posts

Default

That July 14, 1903, patent date is on boxes of the New No. 4 primers --



but not on boxes of the older No. 4 primers --



so I'd expect a connection to the New No. 4 Primers. I haven't had any luck in finding a Winchester Patent with that issue date.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.