Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Damascus Barrels & Steel

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-21-2023, 01:17 PM   #11
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,015
Thanks: 36,638
Thanked 34,093 Times in 12,620 Posts

Default

Excellent information Drew - Thanks!





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2023, 10:51 AM   #12
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 928
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,319 Times in 489 Posts

Default

The gun I bought is earlier than that and the octagon twist section is not a monobloc. The octagon section extends to the end of the forearm tip and the wedding band turned section is beyond that.The damascus pattern only shows after the diameter reduction at the wedding band. The only conclusion I can reach is that the tube was formed with a full length Damascus layer and a twist section for weight and section overlaid at the rear.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Hause View Post
Art: the French adopted Pieper's "Diana Breech" monobloc construction (or maybe Pieper stole the idea from the French?) and it is more likely that the breech monobloc was damascus and the tube twist.
Lots of Pieper's "Modified Diana" barrels (no step down) had a steel breech and damascus tubes

1882

Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post:
Unread 08-22-2023, 11:08 AM   #13
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,015
Thanks: 36,638
Thanked 34,093 Times in 12,620 Posts

Default

Yes, that's exactly what Drew's illustration shows.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2023, 11:19 AM   #14
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

Art: could you please post a close up high resolution images of the section of barrel where the twist and crolle meet? Or send it to me at drewhausemd@yahoo.com as a jpg attachment?

Looking down the bore are you able to see a seam?


Last edited by Drew Hause; 08-22-2023 at 11:38 AM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 08-22-2023, 01:28 PM   #15
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 928
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,319 Times in 489 Posts

Default

First, let me correct myself. I confused the actual details of the barrel layout. The wedding band is on a John Manton converted flintlock fowler hanging next to it. Also, the 10 gauge has a twist front section and the Damascus at the back. I am using the term loosely, but it appears to be a form of Damascus similar to Bernard. The gun is a Galand 10 gauge fowler. It has a 35" barrel with a rear V wing type sight. The barrel is very thick as can be seen from the last picture of the muzzle. The muzzle wall is 0.167" and the chamber wall at the flat (the thinnest point) is 0.356. The gun is heavier than a Scott single 8 gauge I own.

I am familiar with the French monobloc. The first picture is a Manufrance Simplex 26 that is much later fluid steel but has that construction. Most of the French guns I own are built that way. The second picture is of the Galand showing the location of the joint. It is positioned 16" or more down the barrel and no joint shows inside. The other pictures show closeups of the joint. It is obvious that they are made of two different materials. The front looks like a twist construction and the rear some sort of composite. If they are both considered a twist, they are very obviously not the same material. The pattern, ribband sizes and even, to me, the angle of winding are different. You will notice that rear pattern extends forward of the fore end where the taper was turned to merge the two sections and suddenly just runs out. As I say there is no joint seen inside, so I have to assume that the rear section was overlaid on the full length inner tube. The gun is early, heavy, has sights and has a 3-1/2 inch (at least) chamber. Based on that, Ihave to presume it was a market hunter type of gun.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MF16.jpg (503.3 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Galand.jpg (491.6 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg GalandJoint.jpg (490.7 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Galand Joint 3.jpg (484.5 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Galand Muzzle.jpg (234.3 KB, 0 views)
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post:
Unread 08-22-2023, 01:31 PM   #16
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 928
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,319 Times in 489 Posts

Default

The rear portion also may be an early form of chain Damascus, but confused by the octagon form.
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2023, 04:07 PM   #17
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

Thanks for the effort Art.

There were clearly 2 tubes; thinner forward Twist and breech tube Bernard Ribbon - which started this thread

The arrow is the butt weld line



Is there a maker's marks on the bottom of the breech end of the barrel?
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 08-22-2023, 04:22 PM   #18
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 928
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,319 Times in 489 Posts

Default

Thanks Drew. I wasn't aware (and had never seen) that it was a practice to place a circumferential joint in composite tubes. Was this very common? I presume the strips would be end welded together and then ribbons wound and welded in a continuous process.

I will look for a maker's mark. Is there any particular form I should try to find?
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2023, 04:31 PM   #19
Member
Aaron Beck
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 320
Thanks: 56
Thanked 207 Times in 128 Posts

Default

If you follow the spiral around it may show where it was scarfed end on. In theory, it could have been jumped on like it appears in the photo, it wouldnt be any weaker than any of the other spiral welded ribbands. It might have been easier to control the location of the transitition to make it up in two pieces like that. I believe, one of the writeups on Drew's site mentions making barrels of three tube components of varying thicknesses all jumped together.
Aaron Beck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2023, 05:20 PM   #20
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

What Aaron said - 2 different tubes are end to end butt welded/"jumped". Almost all damascus barrels were fabricated with 2 or 3 tube segments - thicker at the breech, and that usually changes the pattern apperance somewhat

Weld line between laminated steel tubes



This would be cool

Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.