Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-19-2011, 09:58 AM   #11
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Bruce,

I think Roster solved the problem for modern high carbon steel barrels.

For older, low carbon and composite barrels Modified Choke is a misnomer. The barrel thickness and choke constriction are key factors.

MOST shooters do not have access to an accurate dial indicator or digital bore gauge and certainly do not have a barrel thickness gauge! We cannot say that steel is okay in a modified choke. That may result in a blown barrel like the .008" failure which you witnessed!

We will test and retest to prove or disprove the hypotheses.

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2011, 12:58 PM   #12
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,623 Times in 2,670 Posts

Default

So are Rem Parkers made with Remington Cro-Moly barrels modern high carbon steel barrels? It is my belief that rem used the same barrel steel for many years, possibly until present. They have gotten thicker for sure, the newer 870's are like galvanized water pipe.

The only Parker I have shot steel in is a Bernard with .006 constriction both barrels and OMG .045 average wall thickness. The unstruck wt (30", No. 2, 12ga) is 6/0lbs. That gun is immensely strong. My thinest gun is a 12 once honed with .028 remaining and I can't say I like anything below .030. Even my 20's are right at 30 and 20s are notorious for being thin. People talk about light guns like they are wonderful but I don't know about lightness if that weight came out of the barrels.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2011, 01:04 PM   #13
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Bruce,

I do not think the high carbon steel used in gun barrels today existed in the 1930's.

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.