Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-28-2020, 08:43 PM   #11
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,935
Thanks: 36,417
Thanked 33,937 Times in 12,567 Posts

Default

It would only make sense that PB would pattern a 28 bore at it's average effective distance and 30 yards sounds about right. Sure, we have made good (lucky?) shots with our 28's out to forty yards or so but that doesn't mean a responsible gun manufacturer should pattern the gun at such a range.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 07:10 AM   #12
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,960
Thanks: 13,985
Thanked 10,371 Times in 3,285 Posts

Default

Thanks to all who have replied so far. So, based on the entry that Chuck shared, Ed M. was correct that at least some 28s were choke patterned at 30 yards.

So, if your 28 was patterned at 30 rather than 40 yards, it would likely have less constriction (at least slightly?) than one patterned at the standard 40 yards. I would really like to see the pellet counts for some 28s.
__________________
"Doubtless the good Lord could have made a better game bird than bobwhite, and better country to hunt him in...but equally doubtless, he never did." -- Guy de la Valdene (from A Handful of Feathers )

"'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy)
Garry L Gordon is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-29-2020, 09:11 AM   #13
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,863
Thanks: 6,317
Thanked 9,177 Times in 4,897 Posts

Default

Pellet counts and patterning procedures for .410s, 28s, and 8s were available to the 1998 PGCA Research Committee, but we just didn't think about putting that information together. Our copying machines just wouldn't handle the right side of a Stock Book page.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 09:29 AM   #14
Member
Jeff K.
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,400
Thanks: 840
Thanked 2,824 Times in 660 Posts

Default

My 28 is choked .012 right and .020 left.
It letters as rh patterned 180 pellets and lh 200 pellets of #8 at 30 yards.
Jeff Kuss is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff Kuss For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 10:19 AM   #15
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,696
Thanks: 1,719
Thanked 8,121 Times in 2,436 Posts

Default

Quote:
The table in the back lists both the 3/4 and 5/8 oz. loads for the 28 and has percentage of #7 shot in a 30 inch circle at **40 yards** I believe the brochure is from the late 1910s or early 1920s(?).
Our North American ammunition companies only offered 5/8 ounce 28-gauge loads until early 1931. Bulk smokeless Powder --

28-gauge Bulk Smokeless Powder Loads 1915-16.jpeg

Early Long 28-gauge Peters TARGET.jpg

TARGET 28-ga.jpg

Dense smokeless Powder, Infallible or Ballistite --

28-gauge Dense Smokeless Powder Loads 1915-16 Infallible or Ballistite.jpg

Dense smokeless Powder, Walsrode --

28-gauge Dense Smokeless Powder Loads 1915-16 Walsrode.jpeg

In early 1931, Western Cartridge Co. introduced the 3/4 ounce, high velocity, progressive burning powder, Super-X 28-gauge load put up in their 2 7/8 inch FIELD shell --

1933 to 39 Super-X 28-gauge.JPG

28-gauge Super-X #6.jpg
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 10:58 AM   #16
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,801 Times in 3,968 Posts

Default

I like the looks of that super x load...I have never been able to get that 2 7/8 length 28 ga box of shells in my collection yet...charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 11:06 AM   #17
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,696
Thanks: 1,719
Thanked 8,121 Times in 2,436 Posts

Default

In the early years of the 28-gauge here in North America Chas. Askins wrote about hand loading 2 1/8 drams of bulk smokeless powder and 3/4 ounce of shot in the 2 7/8 inch hull for his 6 3/4 pound 30-inch Parker Bros. 28-gauge.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-29-2020, 04:56 PM   #18
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,863
Thanks: 6,317
Thanked 9,177 Times in 4,897 Posts

Default

Some of the Askins' guns have been located, and others will be known by serial number, but what about that long legged 28?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-29-2020, 06:48 PM   #19
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,905
Thanks: 1,222
Thanked 5,059 Times in 1,447 Posts

Default

I'm not blaiming the committee that copied the stock books but a more careful placement on the copier would have made the entire patterning information visable. Some copieed pages show all the info, some only a portion, and some not at all. The xerox copier was only 17" wide and the stock books were probably at least another 2". There is even more info past the patterning data. Maybe Bill can tell us what it contained. It was a long and big job copying those books.
Chuck Bishop is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 06-29-2020, 07:56 PM   #20
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,905
Thanks: 1,222
Thanked 5,059 Times in 1,447 Posts

Default

Here is a good example of what I mean about how the placement of the book on the copier was critical. The book could have been placed just a little more to the left and still copied the first left hand column which tells the grade and barrel steel. Also, note that the pellet counts are always ending in either a 0 or a 5. Did they really count those pellets or just guesstimate? They probably just rounded up or down based on a guess. All those 12 gauges in a row couldn't have all been 250 pellets!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg example.jpg (64.6 KB, 3 views)
Chuck Bishop is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.