|
04-04-2024, 10:36 AM | #13 | |||||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
|||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
04-04-2024, 10:46 AM | #14 | ||||||
|
TASTES GREAT!
LESS FILLING! |
||||||
04-04-2024, 11:37 AM | #15 | ||||||
|
Tom, did you give the great Bickel a whipping with your reversed chokes? I once gave Russ a whipping, and I still have the score sheet in my files. It was a rare happening and I should have it framed. What a guy.
|
||||||
04-04-2024, 02:48 PM | #16 | |||||||
|
Quote:
To me, this is a "left barrel first" gun, assuming that the targets are usually going away. If we're talking about choke constriction, that's a whole other subject I had a 32" 1935 Trap Gun that was a modified (.18k) left barrel, and super full (.40k) rt barrel that I did quite a bit of box bird shooting with. The gun was clearly stocked for a right handed shooter, BTW. I always thought that it might have had a little quicker second barrel because of the left barrel recoil impulse dynamics. My theory actually goes a little deeper, but I don't want to take this topic too far into the weeds. |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to todd allen For Your Post: |
04-04-2024, 04:21 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t believe being right or left handed has anything to do with guns being reverse choked. There are an ample number of double trigger British made O/U guns where the front trigger fires the tighter barrel.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
|
|