|
Another try of the ad scan |
01-23-2014, 09:31 PM | #13 | ||||||
|
Another try of the ad scan
Kiffe ad.
|
||||||
01-23-2014, 09:58 PM | #14 | ||||||
|
Thanks Gary, If you read that carefully, there is no confusion. It is what it is. And I am not surprised at that proof testing.
|
||||||
01-24-2014, 02:16 AM | #15 | ||||||
|
Oh I know that lol no way that would fit Hard enough doing that with 3.5" 10 ga . What im saying is you could load a empty hull with a primer then load the rest of it like a muzzle loader. would be very dangerous I bet pour that much shot and powder in a 12 bore .
|
||||||
01-24-2014, 04:27 PM | #16 | ||||||
|
Most likely an advertisement ploy. Not unusual back then. Most companys were interested in selling their product and they didn't care how they did it.
|
||||||
01-24-2014, 07:38 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
I proof tested a Winchester Model 1901 ten gauge cannon with as much powder as the shell would hold (eight drams of black) and more powder up the barrel with a wad in front. I made the mistake of firing it while the cannon was on top of a wood pile instead of on the ground. The cannon did a back flip and landed on the asphalt of my driveway. I guess it was a soft surface, because the cast iron carriage of the cannon was not damaged. This is probably how Winchester did the 9 dram test. Of course, there was no shot in front of my cannon load.
|
||||||
01-24-2014, 09:39 PM | #18 | ||||||
|
woulda loved to seen that bill...charlie
|
||||||
01-25-2014, 02:02 AM | #19 | ||||||
|
Bruce, do you know how many 97's were made with damascus?
|
||||||
01-25-2014, 10:00 AM | #20 | ||||||
|
I don't know.
But here is the one pound test. |
||||||
|
|