Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old assumptions die hard
Unread 05-20-2018, 06:37 PM   #1
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default Old assumptions die hard

Old opinions and experiences die hard although they are sometimes based on flawed assumptions that become ingrained but are nevertheless incorrect. My recent challenge to Paul and others with respect to pressure being a factor in recoil is a case in point.

I started reloading at 14 years old because the then new plastic wads and wraps were replacing the old fiber wads in factory shells. I could no longer buy the short range loads I believed I needed. I did a lot of patterning back in the day with the new loads and the fiber wad loads. The loading companies stated that the patterns with the new loads would not be smaller, just denser. But, at least in the guns I patterned, the patterns were definitely smaller at 20 and 40 yards, the ranges that I patterned my guns. The first year I used the old Lee hand loader which could be purchased for $9.98. It worked and I got my fiber wad loads but it was slow and sometimes the plastic shell crimps would open. I always had to empty my pockets of shot at the end of the day.

The second year I bought a MEC 600 Jr. and I was in heaven. I then purchased a loading manual and found and loaded low pressure loads. I equated low pressure with low recoil simply because my low-pressure loads kicked a lot softer than the factory stuff. I was certainly sensitive to recoil changes in different loads when shooting at paper. But my low-pressure loads were coincidently also low speed loads. I attributed the softer recoil to the pressures but in fact it was the speed of the load that was causing the decrease in recoil. For 54 years I believed low pressure equated to softer recoil and never realized the flaw in my assumption.

Then some of the boys on this site set me straight. At first, I was reluctant to believe them without proof from someone with a ballistics background, so ingrained was my long-term belief. But then I saw the light and mended my thinking. I was just reading one of my old books by Michael McIntosh and he pointed out that pressure has nothing to do with recoil. I felt a bit ashamed of myself for being so wrong for so long. So, I am coming clean and I am going to punish myself. I am sending myself to bed tonight without supper.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.