|
02-18-2015, 10:46 AM | #13 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
03-03-2015, 02:51 AM | #14 | ||||||
|
I had #29218 for a while. It was found, literally in pieces and in paper bags, in a garage. It had been heavily sanded and very sloppily painted with shellac, but I'm certain there was never any checkering.
It is a grade 1 10 gauge top lever hammer gun. I no longer have this gun. Two photos of its found condition, and two of its cleaned and reassembled condition. |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Patrick Hanna For Your Post: |
03-03-2015, 09:09 AM | #15 | ||||||
|
nice save Patrick
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
03-03-2015, 09:32 AM | #16 | ||||||
|
Patrick,
That gun likely originally had checkering since it is a grade 1. All of it has either been worn or sanded off. Since the forend is all below metal and wrist is very thin.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
03-03-2015, 12:05 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
Hi, Brian. That's interesting to know. When I first saw the gun I was pretty ignorant about Parkers (the truth is, I still am). I just accepted it as an uncheckered stock. I wondered about the checkering later. I'm not disputing what you're saying, but there isn't even a hint of checkering on the stock now. Yes, the fore end is WELL below metal. It's a shame. I couldn't have judged the stock wrist, because it's such a massive shotgun anyway. But, yes, the trigger guard is proud of the wood, too. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Patrick Hanna For Your Post: |
03-03-2015, 02:01 PM | #18 | ||||||
|
I once owned an 1877 vintage 0 Grade 12 gauge, serial 10250, that exhibited no checkering on the forend and stock. The barrels were 32" 'Plain Twist'.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired 'Earnest Will' 'Desert Shield' 'Desert Storm' 'Southern Watch' |
||||||
03-03-2015, 03:02 PM | #19 | ||||||
|
For what it's worth I have an 1884(letter) hammer gun with "Stub Twist" 32" barrels and it has checkering. The stub twist was the most basic of twist steels. I truly believe there may have been general rules, but nothing was hard and fast.
A bad segue, but my barrels are in good shape and I've read the reports on the strength of Damascus vs. steel, but does anyone know where I can research the strength differences between the fine english damascus down through the different grades to include my stub twist? |
||||||
03-03-2015, 07:27 PM | #20 | ||||||
|
No. 12465, 10ga, Plain Twist, never saw a checking tool.
|
||||||
|
|