|
10-02-2018, 10:15 AM | #13 | ||||||
|
Also I noticed the 30" barrel measures 29 7/8" . Concerned about that it is not right at 30".
|
||||||
10-02-2018, 10:21 AM | #14 | ||||||
|
Those 25" barrels look pretty good to me. The bore and choke measurements look good too.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
10-02-2018, 11:19 AM | #15 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post: |
10-02-2018, 01:04 PM | #16 | ||||||
|
Don’t fret. It’s quite common for barrels to measure under the ‘whole number’ by an eigth, and occasionally more. Barrels were assembled, in the rough, and once soldered together, the tubes may not have ended up perfectly flush with each other, and also may have required minor facing when being fitted to a receiver.
There are a few sets of barrels floating around in the hands of members, and I have been surprised how precisely they were soldered together, albeit gobs of solder may have been present prior to striking. I have often wondered if the individual tubes were possibly slightly longer to accommodate finish filing, a I do recall a set which had the proper termination, but measured just less than an eigth overs 30”. |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
10-02-2018, 01:18 PM | #17 | ||||||
|
James, check your e-mail
|
||||||
10-02-2018, 04:11 PM | #18 | ||||||
|
Got the email, thanks. Think I am gonna try & make a deal for this gun, Jim.
|
||||||
10-02-2018, 06:57 PM | #19 | ||||||
|
I think you mean photos 2 and 3 are the 25” barrels? Either way... that set looks cut to me.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
10-06-2018, 08:56 AM | #20 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|