Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-27-2018, 02:45 PM   #11
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,787
Thanks: 504
Thanked 18,653 Times in 4,779 Posts

Default

The gun is a head scratcher for sure. The finishes on the gun have been completely restored at one point for sure.

The barrels are likely original based on what the serialization book states. Even though the grade is not matching. That could just be an error. The lack of some typical markings on the barrel flats is a curiosity. But, if it was VERY early in the installation of Vulcan barrels, that could explain variances from the norm. The large '0' is likely in place of the typical 'V'. Since the V was the 0 grade. But it does have the small '5' for the grade of B.

The most bazarr thing is the forend. I have never seen a splinter forend like that on a Parker. It is easily almost twice the length as a standard forend. And the checkering pattern on it is like none that I have ever seen, but then again it goes right along with the forend.
Now... everything else about the forend looks right. The way it is made, the fit and finish and even the way the checkering is cut and the borders all look factory. I am surprised for the forend not to have the typical metal tip on it though.

Only a surviving records will tell for sure. THAT is the key to answering all of those questions.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 08-27-2018, 02:52 PM   #12
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

I think it's been restored from end to end.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 08-27-2018, 03:35 PM   #13
Member
Chris T.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 869
Thanks: 519
Thanked 565 Times in 271 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick de Guerre View Post
Is the spot on the rib just ahead of the extension a fill where a bead was once bizarrely positioned- NDG
I have a DHE that had a copper bead peened onto the opening lever right behind the dolls head extension. It's a known pigeon shooting gun in the typical configuration and I was told by the previous owner that the third bead was something pigeon shooters used to do way back then. It's logical to assume that's what's going on with the rib on the gun in question.
Chris Travinski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chris Travinski For Your Post:
Unread 08-27-2018, 03:56 PM   #14
Member
Nick de Guerre
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Thanks: 32
Thanked 102 Times in 45 Posts

Default

Chris,

You mean BEHIND the extension...on the frame?!?
Nick de Guerre is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2018, 04:27 PM   #15
Member
Chris T.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 869
Thanks: 519
Thanked 565 Times in 271 Posts

Default

Sorry, yes.
Chris Travinski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chris Travinski For Your Post:
Unread 08-27-2018, 04:46 PM   #16
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,221 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Parker No. 82233 was manufactured before Titanic Steel barrels were introduced in 1897 and well before Acme Steel barrels were introduced in about 1903 - both of which would have been the standard fluid steel barrels for the grade 5 guns.
Obviously the person who ordered this gun had a preference for fluid steel and aside from Whitworth Steel, the Vulcan Steel barrels were all that was available if you didn’t want Damascus.

This was a special gun for a special person and he also probably ordered the forend finished in the manner it is today. He was certainly a discriminating fellow...

A research letter may just fill in all the blanks.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 08-27-2018, 05:08 PM   #17
Member
Nick de Guerre
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Thanks: 32
Thanked 102 Times in 45 Posts

Default

Chris T.,

Thanks for clarifying...that's wild. I have not seen that to my immediate recollection. I feel like every gun ever made without a safety is marketed as a "pigeon gun." *smirk* I have seen L.C. Smith material describing them, but can't recall whether there was ever any common thread of characteristics other than typically straight stocks and resulting shallow DOH dimensions. Did Parker ever advertise "Pigeon" or "Live Bird" models/dimensions?


Dean,

Thanks very much for clarifying that. That would make it special indeed.

- NDG
Nick de Guerre is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2018, 08:34 PM   #18
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

That is neat find and definitively something different with that for-end. Whoever the gun was made for probably had some long arms. Maybe gun was made for one of those earlier 7 foot guys we were trying to identify that was discussed here about a few weeks ago with Sara. Now wouldn't that be incredible coincidence.

Oops strike that this gun would pre-date that time frame by about 50 years, but still.
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2018, 09:01 PM   #19
Member
Chris T.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 869
Thanks: 519
Thanked 565 Times in 271 Posts

Default

Here is a picture just for giggles, the copper bead is on the opening lever not the frame. The debate about live bird guns is a another topic all together that has been discussed on here plenty. I'm just pointing out the signs because I find them very interesting.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0830 (3).jpg (503.6 KB, 3 views)
Chris Travinski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chris Travinski For Your Post:
Unread 08-28-2018, 12:36 AM   #20
Member
Nick de Guerre
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 98
Thanks: 32
Thanked 102 Times in 45 Posts

Default

Chris,

Thank you, I've definitely not seen that. Being so close to the eye, I wonder if the idea was basically similar to that of a ghost ring peep...where the eye essentially loses the rear sight as it focuses through to the front. (??)

Great pic.

- NDG
Nick de Guerre is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nick de Guerre For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.