Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Foto Fridays

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-29-2018, 02:32 PM   #11
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,022
Thanks: 4,227
Thanked 2,825 Times in 916 Posts

Default

Middle of the road for a little more shot than 8, a little more power than 9.

1/2 ounce

8 = 205
8.5 = 245
9 = 292

3/4 ounce

8 = 307
8.5 = 373
9 = 439
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 09-29-2018, 02:44 PM   #12
Member
TxHuntermn
Forum Associate
 
Mark Ray's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,623
Thanks: 4,800
Thanked 2,319 Times in 755 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I’m sure 8 1/2 shot works fine for those who use it - heck, why wouldn’t it if sizes 8 and 9 work well.
I bet the first shotshell company that offered 8 1/2 shot only did so to gain a leg-up on the other companys - to offer something nobody else did... not because there was a need for it.

What I’d really like to see some shotshell company come out with is 9 3/4 for woodcock. I’d like something finer than 9’s but 10’s just seem too ‘faddish’ to me...






.
HMMM Dean....Do you shoot much 7 1/2? That is a pretty popular size. funny though, it seems to stop there. I do not recall ever seeing 1/2 size shot larger than 7 1/2...….maybe 00 1/2 will make a big play for the home defense crowd! They seem enamored with flechette, rubber pellets, tracers and bolo rounds!

This though all reminds me of the old saying that fishing plug designers design fishing plugs to catch fishermen, not fish!!!
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row."
Mark Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ray For Your Post:
Unread 09-29-2018, 03:43 PM   #13
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,918
Thanks: 1,231
Thanked 5,085 Times in 1,455 Posts

Default

Used commonly for the first shot in trap doubles.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 09-29-2018, 08:39 PM   #14
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,221 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

Mark, I shoot #8 or #7 normally. Rarely, if ever, #9 or 7 1/2.

For my upland hunting I generally shoot #8 in both tubes in early season and #8 in the right tube with #7 in the left tube for later in the season. I shoot #8 exclusively on clays.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-29-2018, 09:51 PM   #15
Member
StubTwist
PGCA Member
 
Frank Cronin's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 979
Thanks: 6,275
Thanked 1,608 Times in 484 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
Used commonly for the first shot in trap doubles.
For my trap league at the 16 yard line I shoot 1 oz. of 8.5 shot. Less recoil and more pellets (497) in a 1 oz load than 8's (461) and 7 1/2 (394) in a 1 1/8 shell.

8.5's are a great too for 7/8 oz spreader loads for pattern density.
Frank Cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2018, 03:56 PM   #16
Member
Hixie
PGCA Member
 
Ted Hicks's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 345
Thanks: 189
Thanked 818 Times in 198 Posts

Default

I always wondered if the shot manufacturers produce a lot of "off-spec" shot and the 1/2 sizes were a way to sell it rather than have to reprocess it.
Ted Hicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2018, 04:07 PM   #17
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,073
Thanks: 36,785
Thanked 34,221 Times in 12,647 Posts

Default

That makes good sense.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2018, 10:25 PM   #18
Member
Trap3
PGCA Member
 
Randy Davis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 428
Thanks: 940
Thanked 1,148 Times in 277 Posts

Default

Back around 1995, Federal offered a 1 ounce 8 1/2 paper handicap load.
Used them at The Grand American and other Trap shoots that year. Might even have a box tucked away. Wish they were still available.

Trap3
Randy Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Randy Davis For Your Post:
Unread 10-06-2018, 09:24 PM   #19
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 2,037
Thanked 3,366 Times in 1,158 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hicks View Post
I always wondered if the shot manufacturers produce a lot of "off-spec" shot and the 1/2 sizes were a way to sell it rather than have to reprocess it.
That's how it works. Shot doesn't drop all the exact same size, and has to be graded.
My buddy, Chuck, who helped me with the #10 article, measures every batch of shot, and sorts them by size. As an example: some number 7 1/2 Shot might be actually 7 1/4s. Some 8s might actually be 8 1/4 size. Right in the middle is 8 1/2s. More pellets in the pattern than 8s, more energy than 9s.
I don't let the shot size get in my head. See the bird, shoot the bird.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-06-2018, 10:00 PM   #20
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,375
Thanks: 484
Thanked 3,753 Times in 1,599 Posts

Default

Back in the late 60's Remington used to claim that their shotmaking process was the highest volume precision manufacturing operation in the US
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.