![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Last call for ideas before this goes to committee.....
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have a couple of 28's, a DHE and a VHE, but no guns with twin ivories (a couple that are missing the rear bead though... does that count?)
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Dean I don't think the catagory was "it should of had twin beads", they both need to be there.
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
While the displays at each of the events I've been to were great to see, none have had either a progression of one grade, largest bore to small, or one bore, progressing from lowest to highest grade. To me, a 'theme' of twin beds is pretty much a snore.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'm not going to correct my error, because then NO one will know what George is talking about. Plus, it's just more proof he's stalking me.
Actually, re-reading it, that was a pretty good, albeit accidental, pun. I still think twin BEADS is a pretty esoteric theme. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
why not select a couple of high grades and ask for representative gagues in each grade for your display.
AH (all gagues) BH (all gagues) or other select grades and all gagues (eg; AH 12,16,20,28,410) in that grade of Parker |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
I wonder who might have a .410 AH or AHE
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|