Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-15-2011, 06:41 AM   #1
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Theodore,

Welcome aboard! Your information shall serve as a data point in the overall assessment. Since your experiance was not from a "controlled test" we shall enter it as Shooter Experiance.

Could you measure your Browning's modified choke?
Also, what brand/model steel shot did you predominately shoot?
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2011, 08:28 AM   #2
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,701 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Fellows, thanks for considering these important issues.

I got several emails from forum members about their gun clubs moving to non tox ammo and how that seemed to be a disturbing and coming trend. If we don't look at these issues, vintage gun collectors are going to find their use of these guns increasingly restricted.

Generally , we are the most well thought out vintage gun collectors organization, in my opinion. If we don't investigate or push for investigation of shooting steel in vintage guns, who will? Not the gun makers , they want to sell you a new gun, just like they did when fluid steel barrels surpassed damascus barrels. We have some good members, maybe the best in the gun collecting community, and maybe we lead the way in serious investigation for the Browning, Winchester, Fox, Smith, etc folks.

The chamber pressure and recoil issues can be addressed in steel loads just like in lead loads.....don't shoot the heavy stuff that whacks you and the gun.

The unresolved and important issues are constriction and barrel streaking. The Roster shot cup is supposed to prevent streaking and bore erosion, so tests demonstrating that in mild steel vintage barrels are needed. The constriction issue may be resolved now, and there may be research already done that we could retrieve. Maybe what we need is a new series in the DGJ dealing with steel in vintage guns. Remember when the shooting damascus article series came out? Before that there were those who had all sorts of misinformation and rumors about black powder, smokeless powder and damascus.

So all we have so far is anecdotal information, some people have courageously admitted good experiences, maybe there is something there, but certainly more investigation needs to be done. I'm thankful that Mark is interested and wants to look more into it. If we can develop an acceptable and doable testing protocol, that would be best.

We have a person with sleeved barrels and his barrel man told him that steel was acceptable in those barrels. Let's think about that. What makes the sleeved barrels more resistant to steel shot than original Parker fluid steel barrels ? Both are mild steel tubes. Parker then later Rem used the best steel available. Was the best steel available then inferior to the steel tubes used for sleeving today?

So, fellows, thanks for keeping an open mind, as we set out to do in post #1.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2011, 09:04 AM   #3
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,682
Thanks: 6,859
Thanked 10,048 Times in 5,327 Posts

Default

Fred, if your gun came through Del Grego's shop a while back, the sleeving was probably done at Lefever. My sleeved Magnum ten DH actually has Lefever markings on the rib, but it is the only one I have ever seen marked like that. My gun has no other marking that would indicate where the sleeving was done. The rib inscription was changed to "Lefever Steel" from Damascus Steel. The new inscription looks like it was done at the Parker factory, very professional.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-15-2011, 09:31 AM   #4
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Gentlemen,

As Bill commeted, research is needed. It is our intention to conduct controlled tests to investigate how much pressure and strain older barrels can endure without deformation or failure. The test protocols will be very important.

What is most important in conducting research in this emotionally charged subject is to leave those emotions behind and gather data for analysis. These tests will however take time. If we have agreed upon protocols we could establish multiple test teams are different locations. This would provide more data and potentially faster results.

We very seriously intend to publish our results.

If anyone desires to contribute their time, knowledge, or resources please contact me via PM.

Respectfully,
Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 08-15-2011, 10:42 AM   #5
Member
Blind Dog
Forum Associate
 
Fred Preston's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 636
Thanks: 424
Thanked 399 Times in 193 Posts

Default

Bill, Like yours, mine has had "DAMASCUS" replaced, mine being with "PARKER" and it can't be distinguished from the other rib lettering.
Fred Preston is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.