Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Announcement, Help & Introduction Forums New User Introductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-16-2024, 12:22 PM   #31
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,368
Thanks: 3,180
Thanked 12,347 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

I just noticed, in the OP’s first post, the fourth picture shows a bit of the engraved stock shield. It appears to be engraved by the same hand that engraved the shield on my Delgrego/Runge upgraded CHE 28ga. This makes me believe that Delgrego and Robert Runge had a hand in at least the stock of the OP’s gun.
The first picture is my gun. The 2nd (double click it to enlarge it) is the OP's
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7558.jpg (470.7 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg SAIfxKt.jpg (532.9 KB, 12 views)
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread Yesterday, 08:07 PM   #32
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,718
Thanks: 1,743
Thanked 8,188 Times in 2,455 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
Chuck, what I said was "The serial number 131429 is not on the list of 28-gauge guns from the records, published in The Parker Story, page 1005." As much of page 1005 as I could get on my scanner --

Page 1005 The Parker Story 28-gauge Guns, no 131429.jpg
Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread Yesterday, 08:33 PM   #33
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,368
Thanks: 3,180
Thanked 12,347 Times in 3,300 Posts

Default

Without taking anything away from the TPS authors, the time involved in searching the available books didn't permit the necessary scrutiny the research director afforded me. When I acquired 99687, the database said it found no records. This made no sense to me as 99686, and 99688 were listed in the serializations book (99686 is listed as a 28ga) The research director carefully examined the books and found that a red pencil mark obscured the numeral 7, but close examination showed it was a 28ga. The records further showed it was ordered with 99686, as an identical pair.
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread Today, 08:50 AM   #34
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,787
Thanks: 504
Thanked 18,653 Times in 4,779 Posts

Default

The gun was a 28 that was sleeved and kept as a 28g. Who knows why, especially since the gun started out as fluid steel. I have seen it before.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.