Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-30-2024, 06:24 PM   #21
Member
Don Strelioff
Forum Associate
 
Don Strelioff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 67 Times in 35 Posts

Default

The positive on this one is the bulge will 100% gone
Don Strelioff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Don Strelioff For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2024, 10:11 PM   #22
Member
Don Strelioff
Forum Associate
 
Don Strelioff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 67 Times in 35 Posts

Default

Well I competed the task the bores measured .729 both bbl’s 8-10” from the muzzle removed 1 1/8” of bbl back from the muzzle muzzle is 711- 712 729-712 = 717 I’m very pleased with that bore taper to muzzle 3.5 “ give of take a 1/8 of a inch
Installed a bead 3/56 thread small bead
Now I look forward to shooting this gem I would like to try it on a skeet a bit tighter than skeet 11 but should smoke the targets when your on them
Don Strelioff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Don Strelioff For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2024, 11:17 PM   #23
Member
ED J, MORGAN
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 456
Thanks: 1,625
Thanked 534 Times in 173 Posts

Default

any one who looks up the info on the gun will know it was altered.
ED J, MORGAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Yesterday, 12:08 AM   #24
Member
Stan Hillis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 3,591
Thanked 4,291 Times in 1,219 Posts

Default

Anyone knowledgeable who looks down the bores of the gun will also know that a bulge has been "attempted to be removed" because you cannot remove the portion of the bulge that lies between the top and bottom ribs . . . . that is, unless you want to pay the price of having the ribs removed and relaid. You're getting into big bucks there. You make the call on that.

Anyone who attempts to remove a bulge that far down the barrel is mostly doing it for aesthetics sake, because of the reason stated above.

Personally, if I looked down the bores of a potential buy and saw part of a bulge remaining between the ribs on a barrel I would be just as reticent to buy it as I would had it been shortened by two inches, because i would then know what had been done. But that's just me.
Stan Hillis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post:
Unread Yesterday, 01:45 AM   #25
Member
Don Strelioff
Forum Associate
 
Don Strelioff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 67 Times in 35 Posts

Default

Here we go the gallery comments the bulge was completely removed because the bbl’s were cut back behind the bulge no bulge remaining
Not training to hide the fact that the bbl’s were cut
Just made the useless gun shootable
Thanks for your unwarranted comments
Don Strelioff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Don Strelioff For Your Post:
Unread Yesterday, 06:50 AM   #26
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,934
Thanks: 6,378
Thanked 9,252 Times in 4,930 Posts

Default

Funny, I read three pages of comments and didn't read even one that was unwarranted.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread Yesterday, 09:09 AM   #27
Member
Stan Hillis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 3,591
Thanked 4,291 Times in 1,219 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Strelioff View Post
Here we go the gallery comments the bulge was completely removed because the bbl’s were cut back behind the bulge no bulge remaining
Not training to hide the fact that the bbl’s were cut
Just made the useless gun shootable
Thanks for your unwarranted comments

Reply deleted
Stan Hillis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread Yesterday, 03:07 PM   #28
Member
John D.
PGCA Lifer
Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,447
Thanks: 2,247
Thanked 4,235 Times in 835 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Strelioff View Post
Here we go the gallery comments ….
Thanks for your unwarranted comments
Don,

In your first post opening this tread, you stated, in part….
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Strelioff View Post
….
Good idea bad idea pros cons
Let me know your thoughts
….
You appear upset to have received various opinions and thoughts…? I’m not sure they are unwarranted, as they were certainly solicited.

Anyway, just from my end of the telescope.

John
John Dunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to John Dunkle For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.