|
11-02-2024, 11:17 PM | #23 | ||||||
|
any one who looks up the info on the gun will know it was altered.
|
||||||
Yesterday, 12:08 AM | #24 | ||||||
|
Anyone knowledgeable who looks down the bores of the gun will also know that a bulge has been "attempted to be removed" because you cannot remove the portion of the bulge that lies between the top and bottom ribs . . . . that is, unless you want to pay the price of having the ribs removed and relaid. You're getting into big bucks there. You make the call on that.
Anyone who attempts to remove a bulge that far down the barrel is mostly doing it for aesthetics sake, because of the reason stated above. Personally, if I looked down the bores of a potential buy and saw part of a bulge remaining between the ribs on a barrel I would be just as reticent to buy it as I would had it been shortened by two inches, because i would then know what had been done. But that's just me. |
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
Yesterday, 01:45 AM | #25 | ||||||
|
Here we go the gallery comments the bulge was completely removed because the bbl’s were cut back behind the bulge no bulge remaining
Not training to hide the fact that the bbl’s were cut Just made the useless gun shootable Thanks for your unwarranted comments |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Don Strelioff For Your Post: |
Yesterday, 06:50 AM | #26 | ||||||
|
Funny, I read three pages of comments and didn't read even one that was unwarranted.
|
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
Yesterday, 09:09 AM | #27 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Reply deleted |
|||||||
Yesterday, 03:07 PM | #28 | ||||||||
|
Quote:
In your first post opening this tread, you stated, in part…. Quote:
Anyway, just from my end of the telescope. John |
||||||||
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to John Dunkle For Your Post: |
|
|