Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-31-2019, 09:00 AM   #1
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,670
Thanks: 3,371
Thanked 13,412 Times in 3,537 Posts

Default

I could watch that all day. Unfortunately, there's snow to be moved.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 12-30-2019, 11:07 PM   #2
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 507
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,692 Posts

Default

When I toured the Holland and Holland factory about 10 years ago, they said that they had most of their frame designs on CNC machining, however they had several other designs, which they chose not to put on CNC machining, because they did not want to lose the capability of doing unique frames by hand.
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-31-2019, 10:00 AM   #3
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 507
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,692 Posts

Default

I was given a 4 hour tour of the H&H factory by the plant manager about 10 years ago. He said that most of their different frames (shotgun, (SxS and O/U) rifle (Double and bolt) were done by CNC machining, but that they kept several frames to be done by hand, - not that they couldn't program them for CNC, but they didn't want to lose the talent of doing it by hand,so presumably there will be a young apprentice who will learn to do it the old way one of these days. Parts of the plant still looked like the 1800's
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2020, 06:04 PM   #4
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,197
Thanks: 147
Thanked 804 Times in 436 Posts

Default

Nice,video, See how the barrels are wired together & bent with wedges to regulate ? Thats why it’s so difficult to open chokes after a good double is regulated & the ribs are laid. Nothings straight to guide the reamer when opening, the reason you see out of round muzzles. If all open jobs were patterned to check regulation you would see many with different point of impact.

It’s not impossible to open chokes. but simply running a reamer in the bore piloted close to the choke taper is a good way to ruin a nice SXS . Factory single barrel gun it’s not a difficult job. All alike and straight.

William
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to William Davis For Your Post:
Unread 01-01-2020, 07:39 PM   #5
Member
Setter Man
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,798
Thanks: 1,710
Thanked 1,640 Times in 638 Posts

Default

If you add up all of the guns made by those producing “best” guns between 1900 and 1940 I would imagine the total would be a small fraction of the guns produced by Parker over the same period. The majority of Best guns were bespoke, not production guns. They were made with considerable attention to detail, inside and out.
Jay Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-01-2020, 10:22 PM   #6
Member
John Allen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
John Allen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 646
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1,802 Times in 387 Posts

Default

The "Best" guns were hand built for aristocrats,and are works of gunmaking art.The Parkers were built for American sportsmen of all economic classes,and from the Trojan to the Invincible they are a testament to what makes America great.
John Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2020, 12:32 PM   #7
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 802
Thanks: 1,097
Thanked 858 Times in 424 Posts

Default

Mr. Vicknair did another comparison of English Best with Parker https://vicknairgunsmithing.blogspot...pparently.html. The comparison is hand-made vs. machine made.

Ken
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2020, 01:23 PM   #8
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,670
Thanks: 3,371
Thanked 13,412 Times in 3,537 Posts

Default

If you can finish reading it without stopping to breath, or take an Ativan, you’ll probably accept what he’s saying, albeit with a hint of a chip on his shoulder.
All of his pomposity aside, we can love our ‘home made’ guns as much as we want, and deservedly so.
I worked part time, for 16 years, in a steel research foundry in England. In total, I guess I was there about 4 months each year. I learned, very early on, to love proper ale, and spent more than my share of time in the local. A very friendly bartender/ sheep farmer told me once “ Once you get beyond our ‘not invented here’ attitude, we’re not a bad bunch of blokes”
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 01-19-2020, 10:31 PM   #9
Member
stumpstalker
PGCA Member
 
Russell E. Cleary's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,003
Thanks: 11,502
Thanked 2,512 Times in 722 Posts

Default

Mr. Vicknair’s piece does seem plausible and well-argued. He even dispenses with the recurring foul language.

I know my station; and it looks like it’s with the “machine-made” gun.
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19

Last edited by Russell E. Cleary; 01-20-2020 at 04:50 PM.. Reason: a typo: restored key preposition, "with"
Russell E. Cleary is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-20-2020, 02:07 AM   #10
Member
Milton C Starr
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,509
Thanks: 476
Thanked 1,010 Times in 466 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell E. Cleary View Post
Mr. Vicknair’s piece does seem plausible and well-argued. He even dispenses the recurring foul language.

I know my station; and it looks like it’s with the “machine-made” gun.
Seems theres no certain answer on what a best quality even is .
Ive seen them say well its a best quality name but not a best quality gun because it has to be a best quality grade .

Ive always just went by the common line of thought of if its a London made double then its a Best .
Milton C Starr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.