Congratulations Mr Parker! Your grading codes broke my brain!

[Kenn Hogentogler]

Originally Posted by Mills Morrison

Well, Randy beat me to it. There you have it. What does the rest of the gun look like, condition wise?

To me it looks amazing for being made in 1881. I was made a hundred years later than that and it still looks better than me.

[Kenn Hogentogler]

That took me last time and I thought it would. I will admit now that I am not in my element when photographing the shotgun. It's mostly shots taken with my potato just for discussion purposes. ��

https://imgur.com/a/CkksOe2

[Mills]

Very nice gun and in above average condition for the age, appearing from the pictures.

[Eric Estes]

Definitely a grade 2. The "2" on the water table, above the serial number is the grade. A really nice looking gun. Is the actual barrel length 28" as the serialization book reports? I see a fair amount of remaining case color. What we can see of the wood also looks pretty good. If the bores are good you may have a real winner there. Congrats.

[Hammer Gun]

Kenn, Thats a nice looking grade 2 you have there! hard to beat those old lifters, amazing how tight some still lock up. Parker made a fine gun! Gary

[Dean Romig]

That first picture of the "barrel flats" you posted has the D stamp indicating Damascus Steel and the K stamp (actually touching the D {unusual}) indicating the inspection of Charles A. King, who was the gunworks superintendent at the time.






.

[Kenn Hogentogler]

Is the actual barrel length 28" as the serialization book reports?

My yes it is 28" thank you for noticing.

That was a lot of fun! I don't get to say "it's 28inches " that often.

[Bill Murphy]

This is a very high condition gun for its age.

[Kenn Hogentogler]

So, honest opinion: Does the gun go above the fireplace or in it?

[Dean Romig]

Well certainly not in it. With the proper inspection and the proper low pressure loads, it could even be fun to shoot it.






.