![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
LOL Bruce, you got me brother, I have no idea. ![]() The more I look into this Damascus barrel and pressure thing, the more confused I’m getting. ![]() and I have started on the second roll of duck tape around my head. ![]() I’m beginning to truly think this whole thing was indeed invented by the big gun and ammo. manufactures to sell new guns and super duper 4” magnum hit the moon shotshells. ![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I think Mr. Bell showed that damascus barrels are pretty safe. That known, why does everyone say shoot low pressure loads ? Because we don't want to shoot the action loose and to show some respect to 100+ year old guns. It's better to be safe than sorry. I keep my loads under 7000 psi. One thing not discussed was low pressure means less deformation of shot = better patterns. Paul
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Randy Wakefield's recommendation to have damascus barrels x-rayed or other NDI ( non destructive testing) procedure to find cracks was particularly strange. These are composite barrels, not homogenous, and all an x-ray shows is thousands of little lines from the iron and steel ribands that will look like cracks. So I suspect he is recommending something that he has never done or read the reports of being done on damascus barrels.
In response to Paul's comment, I don't know who everyone is, but I use the Parker shot and dram loads for the gauge, gun weight and period of manufacture as my guideline for shooting factory hunting loads in fluid or composite barrels and then back off at least in shot load for clays shooting. When I reload for clays shooting, I use moderate burn rate powders because I don't want the gun or my shoulder to get whacked. I don't specifically pursue low pressure loads, nor do many other people I know. I suppose its also best for preservation of my vintage sports car to never drive it above 60 mph, but I like to know that I can, and every once in a while, I like to drive it to its capabilities, which in truth are greater than my personal comfort zone. Last edited by Bruce Day; 09-16-2010 at 11:03 AM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I've been pondering the safe to shoot Damascus question for some time. It seemed almost a silly question after awhile. Many English guns show current nitro proof stamps. Many people still are shooting guns without those proof stamps.
The people that seem to be in they are bombs waiting to go off crowd mostly are working from a friend of a friend point of view. My GH Damascus was manufactured in 1924. I have feeling that Parker after 50 plus years would know by then if there was some inherent problem with Damascus and twist barrels. I doubt the first owner of my Parker spent a lot of time searching out "low pressure" loads. Likely he or she wandered down to the local hardware store and bought whatever 2 3/4" shell they could find with the preferred shot size. When I bought my GH I bought it to shoot. The bores were excellent and untouched by a hone. The wall thickness was as it should be. There are no dents dings or pits. The barrels are on face. There are no cracks in the stock. I would have considered all of those things when deciding if a gun was safe to shoot no matter fluid steel or Damascus. My GH is a good sound gun. I'll shoot as God and Parker Bros. intended. I’ll keep it in proper working order and pay attention for possible barrel obstructions just like I would any other firearm. In my job i do get to see plenty of shotguns with split, damaged barrels. We had a new 870 with a pretty good split and no more more choke tube brought back just the other day. A little mud will do that as the youngman learned. Okay that was my ramble for the day. Now it is time to get ready and go to work. I have guns to photograph. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bates For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
"Okay that was my ramble for the day. Now it is time to get ready and go to work. I have guns to photograph."
"Work"? Bill, you have one very sweet job. ![]() Last edited by Mike Stahle; 09-16-2010 at 12:55 PM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Mike: you'll note the 'revdocdrew' fella did a little jousting with Randy on that first ShotgunWorld thread http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/view...p?f=3&t=209636
This is Randy's authoritative source: Clark Towle http://yarchive.net/gun/barrel/damascus_barrels.html "I know of no true damascus barreled shotguns that were ever proofed for smokeless powder." Nitro Proof 1 1/2 oz. ![]() "No hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver." The worst blindness is refusing to see.
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home Last edited by Drew Hause; 09-16-2010 at 12:35 PM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
You haven't seen my pay checks, they barely covered what I was spending at work. It is like being a user and dealer at the same time. It keeps you broke but you keep going back for a fresh fix.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bates For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Drew,
I have a Parker GH Damascus 10 GA that is proofed to 3 & 1/2 tons or 10,500 PSI. I'll try to post a photo soon... Mark |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|