![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
More than one factor effects the felt recoil of a gun. Chamber length is one of them. In relation to the cartridge length, of course. If the mouth of a case restricts the passage of the charge into the forcing cone and barrel proper, it will contribute to felt recoil. But not by much.
Other factors include the LOADING. Which, in the case of most commercial ammunition is fairly "stiff." Each firm has its own idea of a good 20-bore load. Gun weight is another factor. So is stock configuration. Buttstock "plate" or pad. Shooting style, etc. However, I've fired thousands upon thousands of handloaded 3/4 oz. 20-bore loads in 2 3/4-inch cases/2 1/2 -inch chambers with perfect comfort and results. But that's just me... |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Bruce has previously made the point that some factory 20g cases are shorter than 2 3/4"
Estate (Federal) 2 5/8"; Fiocchi 2 11/16"; Nobel Sport 2 3/4"; Winchester 2 5/8"; Winchester Universal 2 9/16"; Remington Gun Club 2 11/16" ![]() If the case mouth looks like the one on left, it's a problem in YOUR gun ![]() A summary of “Long Shells in Short Chambers”, by Sherman Bell with technical assistance from Tom Armbrust in “Finding Out for Myself” Part V, Double Gun Journal, Winter 2001 is about 1/3 way down here. This was a PRESSURE, not RECOIL study https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Here are 2 20ga hulls , a Fed top gun at .610 and a new style Win AA at .608 .I load the AA hulls with 7/8 oz for hunting in my 2 1/2 chamber Parkers and LC Smith. The AA hulls with a polywad works great for those full choke guns.
__________________
" May you build a ladder to the stars climb on every rung and may you stay forever young " Bob Dylan |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to James L. Martin For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Bruce has demonstrated this with pictures before. Win AA's are not 2 3/4". Put them next to an RST shell and they are just barely longer. This is not the case for all shells as Cheddite shells such as Herters are markedly longer than the AA's. Rem 20's are similar to the AA's, I dont know about Federals.
I shoot factory AA's and Rem thru my Parker 20 fluid steel 20's, but most of the time am shooting 3/4 oz AA reloads and they are really sweet to shoot. I cut down Herters 20's to 2 1/2" and have scaveged RST 20's, so lately have been loading them esp for my older damascus guns such as my Manton 20 hammer gun.
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
In the picture Drew posted with various spent shells lined up is a good illustration of varying lengths of shell casings. If you were to add another line on the board at 2 3/8", wouldn't that make you pucker just a bit
__________________
"There are two kinds of hunting: ordinary hunting, and ruffed grouse hunting"-Aldo Leopold |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
I should have made the point earlier that the majority of "off the shelf" ammo makers load their shell to the charge necessary to fully cycle the semi-autos out there today, which are primarily inertia operated... but even the gas operated semi-autos require a minimum of pressure to operate properly.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Hey Drew;
Maybe missing something. I just put in the variables you mentioned in the calculator you linked to. Sorry could't resist since you are from the "Show me" state. I put in 1.375 ounces of shot, 1295 fps, 8 lb gun, 33 grains for the wad just showed up in calculator, then put in 102.5393 grains of powder which is equivalent to 3.75 drams of powder. I came up with 67.4 foot pounds of recoil energy, not 32.6 lbs. I could be wrong but 1 dram of powder is suppose to equal 27.344 grains of powder. That maybe the variable that is messing up. 3.75 times 27.34 equals 102.5393 Also my original calculator based on rifles did not account for wad weight, which might add to recoil a tiny bit. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I think your issue is the table is for smokeless which is measured by weight. BP is by volume.
27 grains is equal to 1 dram of black powder. 102 grains of smokeless in a shell you can pretty much expect a grenade to go off. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Cronin For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|