![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I tend to agree that a 2 barrel set is not that great. It's really like owning 1-1/2 guns. Every time I look at the second set of barrels I think "Man, if only I had a receiver and stock I'd have two guns!"
As for the 'damaged barrels' concept, it's not a bad thought but are we really seeing Parkers with damaged barrels that much anyore? I'd rather have a spare buttstock. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I never stop learning from you guys. But, I almost had to laugh, you started out comparing a model 21 to a Parker and all of a sudden it took a sharp turn and we are on to a discussion about 2 barrel Parkers, also very informative and interesting. I had to cringe at the thought of falling with a C grade 20 gauge and somewhere along the line we forgot all about the model 21's. If you love Parkers, you just love Parkers, no use wasting time on anything else. I have a VHE 16 on an 0 frame that I love which makes me look like a great shot, but it is the gun! It may not be an AHE but I wouldn't trade it for any model 21. Thanks for all the great info. , you guys are great.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Alfred Greeson For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
No surprise here....Parker men prefer Parkers! I am a upland hunter. I like light guns that swing natural and are a tad wispy. Weight coupled with balance must be just right. Not all parkers have this quality but a fair number in all gauges do. This is the quality that the English best gun is known for. I have a couple Parkers that have this quality......GHE-20 28" at 5lbs-15oz and a VH-16 that really has it! The 16 gun sports 26" tubes and comes in at 6lbs-1oz. My mind thinks 28" barrels are best but this gun proves different! I can't miss in the heavy thickets with it. Did I mention that it is a original two barrel set and the 2 marked set is 32" long mod and full!, and yes they get used when hunting roosters, man do they swing nice! Lets talk about the model 21....I would think they make for great duck and target guns. Strong and over built...all the weight is at the center of the gun and here lies the trouble. This makes for a poky gun that does not track and stay with the target. A feller can learn to shoot any gun if he shoots it long enough but will seldom say he can't miss with it! Like Parker guns Winchester built a few that have these qualities of proper balance. Maybe the 6lb 20ga. or the 6lb-6oz 16ga. have it? I own just one model 21, its a 16 gauge and its nice at 6lbs-8oz Its a early built, double trigger, pistol grip, splinter. The tubes are 26" and the gun does not have that special balance I want....close but not just right. Its muzzle end is too light and does not have that follow thou swing like the two Parkers noted above have. As a personal note....I like the look the Parker frame has over the 21. The 21 frame is long, plain and has little going on. They stole the bullet point look from the Fox gun and to own a grade above field that never had the fine engraving the Parkers have. The 21 are cost prohibitive in todays market due to the fact that few were made. So there you have it.....This is why the safe has so many Parkers and only one field grade 21 that I have not used to hunt birds with, why would I when I have such a bird shooting Parker gun that doe's not miss !!!!...(-: Thanks all SXS ohio
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kenny Graft For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I'm surprised that no one has related the torture test story on I think it was the mod 21. Winchester or someone torture tested every dbl gun on the planet to where they broke but in the end were unable to hurt a mod 21 after some gawdawful amount of rounds. They finally just gave up. Someone must have the stats on that testing.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
I believe that was John Olin's test for strength! The 21 tested never did fail.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Question: did anyone ever shoot them for long? Just asking because there are a couple of "reputable" dealers on the east coast that have dozens of them listed for sale, all of them in 95%-97% condition. ;-)
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Umm...Hello... ![]() My favorite part of the story relates that well after the failure of all of the other doubles, Winchester began to disassemble their test gun and continue to fire it with integral parts missing to see if they could produce a failure. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Many East Coast 21s have been refinished. Model 21 guys know the difference. They're kind of like Purdeys. Real collectors know the difference. The "English guns are expected to be refinished" is a myth. English guns in original high condition sell for much more than refinished ones. Same goes for 21s except that there are more uninformed 21 buyers than English gun buyers.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|