![]() |
Visit Brad Bachelder's homepage! | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
No way to know Brad, but a "few" have been reported. Whatever that means.
This gun was purchased at the Las Vegas arms show. I see it as an interesting exercise in gunsmithing craftsmanship and a "what if" look if Parker had commercially produced sidelock hammerless guns. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Bruce
Is that 262X? David |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Bruce I am a little surprised that Parker did not offer this design during the transition period, Hammer Sidelock to sidelock to box lock. I guess that Lefever filled that niche. H&R never got up to production speed to compete with Parker.
One more area of study if they had. Brad |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
The safety button on that Parker is from a Lefever.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
I have located another of these conversions with a PGCA letter from Ron Kerby indicating the conversion was done by Parker. The ser # of this gun is 2625. The current owner has read the letter to me and I will try and obtain a copy.The gun is for sale and one of our members, a good friend, is interested. More to follow. The current owner believes Parker has Lefever do the work?
David Last edited by David Dwyer; 02-04-2015 at 08:31 AM.. Reason: added info |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
comparision
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Interesting relocation of the plunger lock-screw I hadn't noticed before.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I can appreciate the engineering that went into these conversions, but I wish they used low grade hammer guns, instead of spoiling beautiful grade 3 hammer guns. Maybe it's just me.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|