![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I agree Allan - it is all conjecture but we're trying to find some kind of "common denominator" in the hope of finding a more conclusive answer. Even if we find it.... we still won't be able to prove it beyond the shadow of a doubt, but we might find something we can all agree is probably the answer.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Often the layout and checkering pattern of the forend can give the best clue as to dollar grade or grade number.
Do you have pictures of the forend checkering? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Todd,
The carving of the bolsters or lack there of is a good indication of the grade of these early guns. It changed a little over time with the top grade having a full tear-drop and each lower grade having a little less. I have a copy of some drawings of the bolsters from these early guns and the C grade equivalent had a small point at the back of the bolster which your gun dose not. My guess would be that you have a Grade 3 (D grade) equivalent of the early Dollar grade guns. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Larry Frey For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I agree with Larry concerning the sculpting of the bolster indicative of a Grade 3 or D Grade. However, there are contradictions to this 'rule' and Tom Latham's 20 ga lifter, which is a lower, possibly lowest grade, has the same sculpting.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Of course. Just like my theory that Parker was stamping frame sizes under the trigger plates on frames for a small range of serial numbers. All we can do is report these odd findings and speculate on what they may mean.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|