![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Dean,
I am missing my articles on 11-Gauge Parkers; History of Shotgun Chokes; Meriden Parker #90 & Prototype Parker that were on published in Parker Pages Issues. Vol. 2/No. 4 July/Aug/ 1995 Vol. 3/No. 4 May/June 1996 Vol. 3/No. 6 Nov/Dec. 1996 If you could send me Digital Copies of my articles it would be very helpful and greatly appreciated. I plan to attend the SXS, and I will bring my Bore and Chamber Gauges with hopes that I will be able to measure some Early Parkers. Thanks, Richard B. Hoover |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Dean,
I found the Parker Pages index and see that Charlie Herzog also wrote an article about our ilion and Meriden trip and that Ron Kirby May have solved the F.9.R. Mystery. Are these old issues available in hard copy or .pdf form? Richard |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Dean,
That would be great. I have some of the issues but can't find others. I think my articles about the Meriden trip and the T-latch Parkers were published in late 1996 or early 1997 |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
It is in issue 3 in 1996. "A Quest for the elusive 11 gauge Parker"
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Jack,
I am sorry that your gun was not a 14-gauge as advertised. The seller may have honestly thought it was a 14 as well. In that case he may be willing to make an adjustment for you. I do not know where the misconception about Parker gauges came from. Many measurements on early Parkers clearly have shown that from the very beginning the bores and chambers of the Parker shotguns were finished with extreme precision. Your gun provides another important data point, showing that Parker was not over boring the early barrels out of the gauge size range as was suggested in early writings. They did recommend using larger size wads, to achieve a better seal in order to produce the hardest shooting gun they could, but that did not alter the relationship between bore diameter, Gauge number and the proof loads they used to test the barrels before the gun was finished. Thanks for your information about this early Parker. Yours, Richard B. Hoover |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Thanks, Richard, but an adjustment is not necessary. I do believe the seller thought it was a 14 gauge, too. In fact, this very same gun was sold on a firearms website several years ago, and it was advertised as a 14 gauge at that time. Regardless of the gauge, I'm happy with the gun. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Richard, I was saving my 10,000th post on this forum for something worthwhile and where I could help someone in this great fraternity... Thank you for giving me that opportunity. I will be more than happy to send those electronic files this evening.
Again, Thank You! Dean |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Thanks. That is wonderful. I had all of those issues of Parker Pages but took the out of my binder and have no idea where they are now. In the past 18 years, since those articles were written, the mysteries of the Parker 11 gauge gun are slowing becoming more clear. I have just made my reservations at the Baymont Inn for the SXS. I could not book a room at the Hampton but apparently the Baymont is just across the street. I now have to reserve my seat for the Banquet, so I need to find the info about sending in my check. Larry Potterfield may also come and bring his interesting Parkers. I hope so, as I am looking forward to meeting him and seeing his guns. Thanks for all your help. Richard
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Richard B. Hoover For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 0968, 13 gauge? uplifter, 1866 |
|
|