![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Andy
Thanks for expressing the vast majority of our feelings. I have shot a few NSCA events and it is ALL about moving up in class and winning, period. The SXS events is ALL about enjoying yourself with friends and shared interests. I have seen one of our "top guns" shoot a wining score and then not turn in his card because he felt he had won enough events. I fell that is what we are about:not just winning but also helping your friends also enjoy the shoot. David |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to David Dwyer For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Keeping things the way they are promotes interest in guns, gun collecting, and gun trading. Allowing tubes in vintage gun competition will run the present competitors out of the game. Tubed competition style guns are an unfair advantage.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
how about a gun that has been permanently rechambered down one gauge.
(IE: 10 bore rechambered permanently to a 12) |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Truitt For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Why not allow any gauge so long as the shot payload is the same?
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog! USMC Retired USMC Distinguished Marksman USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Mark,
As a way of resurrecting a gun that otherwise would not be usable. I personally understand the concerns with tube sets but I don't see why rechambering a gun, to resurrect it, should be an issue. That should be no unfair advantage to any shooter. IMO by doing so you have just reintroduced a gun to the world, stimulated the economy by paying for the work ( I think I am saying this correctly) |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Why not allow any gauge so long as the shot payload is the same?[/QUOTE]
I don't understand this comment Mark? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I wonder how complicated that might become.... An inspector with a set of inspection tools and charts much like is done at car racing events to be sure everyone is sticking to the rules. How would an inspector determine if a gun were "permanently" rechambered? |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Or a 16 to a 20?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Ed Blake For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|