Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2013, 10:40 AM   #1
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 8,982 Times in 2,624 Posts

Default

Good question. Pretty sure no one left alive knows the answer.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2013, 10:35 PM   #2
Member
paul stafford jr
Forum Associate
 
paul stafford jr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 261
Thanks: 130
Thanked 65 Times in 51 Posts

Default

my 1905 DHE has 30 in barrels and is marked 3 in. chambers, that's why I purchased it, its the only one I have seen.
paul stafford jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 08:04 AM   #3
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,287
Thanks: 378
Thanked 4,322 Times in 1,401 Posts

Default

Wm. Cashmore Pigeon gun

Drew Hause is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Old 12-18-2013, 11:57 AM   #4
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 8,982 Times in 2,624 Posts

Default

Quote:
my 1905 DHE has 30 in barrels and is marked 3 in. chambers, that's why I purchased it, its the only one I have seen.
Parker Bros. generally didn't mark the chamber length on their guns. The later Remington built Parkers were marked as to chamber length. Unless there is information in a PGCA letter to indicate 3 in. chambers, I'd suspect that lengthening the chambers and marking the gun was something done after market.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:00 PM   #5
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,940
Thanks: 1,787
Thanked 8,562 Times in 3,351 Posts

Default

If Remington was marking them in the later days, could they be Remington replacements?

is there a repair code on the barrels?
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2013, 11:43 AM   #6
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 8,982 Times in 2,624 Posts

Default

It is rather "strange" that the ad from Winchester, gives the loads with DuPont Smokeless, New E.C. Improved and New Schultze in grains. They were all bulk smokeless powders and should have been given in drams. Fanning's load with Infallible, a dense smokeless powder, was correctly given in grains. It was actually a rather light load, as the loading companies offered up to 28-grains of Infallible pushing 1 1/4 ounces of shot from 2 3/4 inch and longer 12-gauge hulls.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2013, 11:52 AM   #7
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,287
Thanks: 378
Thanked 4,322 Times in 1,401 Posts

Default

This is the best conversion I've come up with, but may not be exact

..............'E.C.'......DuPont…....Schultz…..... ..Ballistite....Infallible

3 dram....42...........36.5............42........... ...24.............21 grains
3 1/4…...45.5.........41...............45............. .26.............23
3 1/2…...49............43...............48............ ..28.............25

http://books.google.com/books?id=97d...AJ&pg=PA57&lpg
http://books.google.com/books?id=Wv0...J&pg=PA446&lpg

Note that the Winchester loads include "New E.C. Improved" and "New Schultz"
Drew Hause is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Old 12-23-2013, 04:44 PM   #8
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 8,982 Times in 2,624 Posts

Default

That Winchester ad looks to be from 1906 by the date code at the bottom, well after Capt. A.W. Money had the blow up at Oakland Park, NJ, and Schultze and E.C. went to become products of Laflin & Rand. By 1905 L & R were advertising "New Schultze" and "New E.C. Improved". By January 1907, Laflin & Rand's "New E.C. Improved" and "New Schultze" were being advertised as a product of E.I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Company. Can we say monopoly??
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2013, 08:21 PM   #9
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,809 Times in 3,972 Posts

Default

very interesting stuff here..seems to be the start of shooters useing heavier loads..i like the guns with the early 3 inch chambers.. almost got me a 3 inch 16 ga shell a while back.....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2013, 12:50 AM   #10
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 8,982 Times in 2,624 Posts

Default

Forget the chronology I started out with for shell lengths growing in the late 1890s. I was working in the beginnings of smokeless powder shotshells.

Check this out from the 1880 Union Metallic Cartridge Co. catalogue --

Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.